Promoting Children's Participation in a Participatory Design Process in a Rural School: A new role needed?

Dyego Carlos Sales de Morais; Taciana Pontual Falcão; Patrícia Tedesco

doi:10.5753/jbcs.2024.3114

Authors

Dyego Carlos Sales de Morais Federal University of Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5223-1474
Taciana Pontual Falcão Rural Federal University of Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2775-4913
Patrícia Tedesco Federal University of Pernambuco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9450-9219

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/jbcs.2024.3114

Keywords:

Participatory Design, Children Participation, Rural Schools

Abstract

In Brazil, Education of Rural Areas is a model which started with social movements and became a public policy with the aim of improving participation of people of rural areas in making decisions about the model of their education. Schools in that context need to improve access to scientific and technological knowledge, but ensuring that previous values and knowledge of the students about agroecology and sustainability are considered. Even though some studies focus on digital inclusion and teacher training to use technologies in rural schools, very few address the development of digital technologies by students themselves, in this context. Participatory Design (PD) is a method often used to develop technological artifacts that could help address this gap. Of particular interest in the context of Education of Rural Areas, PD includes a valid preoccupation with power balance between designers and target users in decision-making. However, this power balance is still hard to attain, even more when design involves vulnerable groups, like children. In this sense, models and frameworks of children's participation can give a more solid theoretical framing for PD with children. In this paper, we present a theoretical model for supporting PD with children which was drawn from theories of children's participation, and refined through its application for qualitatively analysing a design process of digital educational artifacts with children from rural schools in Brazil. We highlight children’s autonomy in the creation of artifacts within a process managed by adults, which we interpret as a new role of children in PD which emerged from the educational context, that is children as artifact designers. The model proposed can be used for researchers and designers to plan or to analyse children's participation in PD interventions, helping them to employ methods that promote their autonomy and participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ackermann, L., Feeny, T., Hart, J., and Newman, J. (2003). Understanding and evaluating children’s participation: A review of contemporary literature. London: Plan UK/Plan International. Available online [link].

Alhatem, M. (2019). Children involvement in participatory design process: A background review. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 8:474-483. DOI: 10.30534/ijatcse/2019/7581.42019.

Amstel, F. M. v. (2009). Políticas de participação no design de interação. In Proceedings of the 4th Information Design International Conference/ 3rd InfoDesign Brazil / 3rd Congic. Sociedade Brasileira de Design da Informação – SBDI. Available online [link].

Antle, A. N. and Hourcade, J. P. (2022). Research in child-computer interaction: Provocations and envisioning future directions. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 32:100374. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100374.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 35(4):216-224. DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225.

Bordenave, J. E. D. (1994). O que é participação, volume 8. Brasiliense São Paulo. Book.

Boyden, J. (1997). Childhood and the policy makers: a comparative perspective on the globalization of childhood', in a. james and a. prout (eds), constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. london: Falmer press. brennan, s. and noggle, r.(1998), john rawls's children', in s. m. turner and gb matthews (eds), the philosopher's child: Critical per-spectives in the western tradition. rochester, ny: University of rochester press. cassidy, c.(2006a). Child and Community of Philosophical Inquiry', in Childhood and Philosophy: Journal of the International Council of Philofophical Inquiry with Children, 2(4). Available online [link].

Caldart, R. S. (2012). Educação do campo. Dicionário da educação do campo, pages 259-267. Available online [link].

Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World development, 22(7):953-969. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4.

Druin, A. (1999). Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '99, page 592–599, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/302979.303166.

Druin, A. (2002). The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology, 21(1):1-25. DOI: 10.1080/01449290110108659.

Druin, A. and Fast, C. (2002). The child as learner, critic, inventor, and technology design partner: An analysis of three years of swedish student journals. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3):189-213. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020255806645.

Ehn, P. and Kyng, M. (1991). Cardboard computers: Mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In Design at work, pages 169-195. CRC Press. Available online [link].

Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., and Iversen, O. S. (2015). In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74:93-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004.

Gona, J. K., Hartley, S., and Newton, C. R. (2006). Using participatory rural appraisal (pra) in the identification of children with disabilities in rural kilifi, kenya. Rural and Remote Health, 6(3):1-10. Available online [link].

Hagen, E. S. et al. (2012). Co-designing with children: Collecting and structuring methods. In DS 71: Proceedings of NordDesign 2012, the 9th NordDesign conference, Aarlborg University, Denmark. 22-24.08. 2012. Available online [link].

Hart, R. A. (1992). Children's Participation [microform] : From Tokenism to Citizenship. Innocenti Essays No. 4. United Nations Children's Fund. Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse [Washington, D.C.]. Available online [link].

Hart, R. A. (2008). Stepping Back from `The Ladder': Refl ections on a Model of Participatory Work with Children, pages 19-31. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2.

Hussain, S. (2010). Empowering marginalised children in developing countries through participatory design processes. CoDesign, 6(2):99-117. DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2010.499467.

Hussain, S., Sanders, E. B.-N., and Steinert, M. (2012). Participatory design with marginalized people in developing countries: Challenges and opportunities experienced in a field study in cambodia. International Journal of Design, 6(2). Available online [link].

Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C., and Dindler, C. (2017). Child as protagonist: Expanding the role of children in participatory design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '17, page 27–37, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3078072.3079725.

Jordan, B. and Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The journal of the learning sciences, 4(1):39-103. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2.

Kam, M., Ramachandran, D., Raghavan, A., Chiu, J., Sahni, U., and Canny, J. (2006). Practical considerations for participatory design with rural school children in underdeveloped regions: Early reflections from the field. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '06, page 25–32, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/1139073.1139085.

Kirby, P., Lanyon, C., Cronin, K., and Sinclair, R. (2003). Building a culture of participation: Involving children and young people in policy, service planning, delivery and evaluation. Department for Education and Skills. Available online [link].

Lamichhane, D. R. and Read, J. C. (2020). Play it my way: Participatory mobile game design with children in rural nepal. In Cross-Cultural Design. User Experience of Products, Services, and Intelligent Environments: 12th International Conference, CCD 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part I, page 325–336, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49788-024.

Landoni, M., Rubegni, E., Nicol, E., and Read, J. (2016). How many roles can children play? In Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC '16, page 720–725, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2930674.2932222.

Lansdown, G. (2005). ?` Me haces caso?: El derecho de los niños pequeños a participar en las decisiones que los afectan. Bernard van Leer Foundation. Available online [link].

Matthews, H. (2003). Children and regeneration: setting an agenda for community participation and integration. Children & Society, 17(4):264-276. DOI: 10.1002/CHI.745.

Merriam, S. B. and Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. Book.

Molina, M. C. (2012). Legislação educacional do campo. Dicionário da educação do campo, pages 453-459. Available online [link].

Molina, M. C. (2014). Políticas públicas em educação do campo: avanços e desafios do pnld campo. Livro Didático e Educação do Campo. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Educação da UFMG, pages 25-33.

Morais, D., Falcão, T. P., e Peres, F. A., and Tedesco, P. (2021a). Processos de desenvolvimento participativo de tecnologias digitais educacionais nos contextos urbano e da educação do campo. In Anais do XXIX Workshop sobre Educação em Computação, pages 111-120, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC. DOI: 10.5753/wei.2021.15902.

Morais, D., Falcão, T. P., and Tedesco, P. (2022). Children's participation in the design of digital artifacts in rural schools. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-11. DOI: 10.1145/3554364.3559110.

Morais, D., Falcão, T., and Tedesco, P. (2021b). Participação infantil no design de artefatos digitais: Considerações teórico-metodológicas. In Anais do XX Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC. Available online [link].

Morais, D. C. S. and Rocha Falcão, T. P. (2019). Abordagem participativa de desenvolvimento de jogos digitais educacionais no contexto escolar. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 27(01):132. DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2019.27.01.132.

Osuchukwu, N. P. and Edewor, N. (2016). Make the children read: Participatory rural approach in school libraries in umueri, nigeria. Library Philosophy & Practice. Available online [link].

Percy-Smith, B. (2005). I've had my say but nothings changed! where to now? critical reflections on children's participation. In Paper presented at Emerging issues in the Geographies of Children and Youth Conference. Brunel University. Available online [link].

Peres, F. A. e., Pontual Falcão, T., and Morais, D. (2020). Demults: Desenvolvimento educacional de multimídias sustentáveis. Ludicidade, jogos digitais e gamificação na aprendizagem. Book.

Read, J. C., Fitton, D., Sim, G., and Horton, M. (2016). How ideas make it through to designs: Process and practice. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI '16, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/2971485.2971560.

Reddy, N. and Ratna, K. (2002). A journey in children’s participation. Bangalore: The Concerned for Working Children. Available online [link].

Ribeiro, M. (2012). Educação rural. Dicionário da educação do campo, pages 295-301. Available online [link].

Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., and Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons. Book.

Schepers, S., Dreessen, K., and Zaman, B. (2018). Rethinking children’s roles in participatory design: The child as a process designer. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 16:47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.12.001.

Shier, H. (2001). Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations. Children & society, 15(2):107-117. DOI: 10.1002/chi.617.

Shier, H. (2010). Teoría de la participación infantil y su relevancia en la práctica cotidiana. E. d. CESESMA, Incidencia de niños niñas y adolescentes como ciudadanos/as activos/as en Nicaragua. San Ramón, Matagalpa: Universidad del Norte de Nicaragua. Available online [link].

Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication, 52(2):163-174. Available online [link].

Treseder, P. (1997). Empowering Children and Young People: A Training Manual: Promoting Involvement in Decision-making. Save the Children Fund. Book.

Trilla, J. and Cámara, A. M. N. (2001). Educación y participación social de la infancia. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación (OEI), 2001, num. 26, p. 137-164. DOI: 10.35362/rie260982.

van Doorn, F. (2016). Children as co-researchers in design: Enabling users to gather, share and enrich contextual data. PhD thesis. Available online [link].

Yip, J. C., Sobel, K., Pitt, C., Lee, K. J., Chen, S., Nasu, K., and Pina, L. R. (2017). Examining adult-child interactions in intergenerational participatory design. CHI '17, page 5742–5754, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025787.