FeelIt: A Tool for Expressing Real-Time Emotions and Its Influence on the Audience Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/jbcs.2026.6576Keywords:
Engagement, Events technolgies, Audience participation, Music performance, Audience experienceAbstract
Live music is not only an artistic expression but also a social encounter in which performers and listeners negotiate meaning. While popular concerts often embrace this exchange through collective gestures and technological mediation, classical recitals usually preserve a strictly passive audience role. This work investigates how digital interaction can bridge this gap. We designed FeelIt, a mobile and web-based application that transforms spectators’ emotional responses into visual projections, thereby integrating the public into the concert atmosphere without altering the music itself. The system was evaluated during an international piano seminar, where engagement was assessed through direct observation, the User Engagement Scale (UES), and qualitative accounts from both listeners and performers. Audience members highlighted the novelty, aesthetic appeal, and rewarding nature of the tool, though some reported difficulties related to interface design and reaction visibility. Musicians, in turn, emphasized that the visual feedback generated a stronger sense of dialogue with the public and intensified their emotional connection during performance. Beyond reporting empirical evidence, this work contributes by (i) introducing and validating a non-intrusive mechanism for audience participation in classical concerts, (ii) offering insights into how interactive technologies can enrich experiences without compromising artistic integrity, and (iii) providing practical design guidelines for integrating spectators’ voices into traditionally passive cultural events.
Downloads
References
Andriani, R., Mellyzar, M., Lukman, I. R., Muttakin, M., Pasaribu, A. I., and Fadli, M. R. (2024). A review of digital assessment in education: Tools, feature, and effectiveness. In Proceedings of Malikussaleh International Conference On Education Social Humanities And Innovation (Miceshi), volume 1, pages 0023-0023. Available at:[link].
Araújo, C. G., Martins, G., Gomes, G., Kienen, J. G., de Freitas, R., Castro, T., and Gadelha, B. (2022). Coffee break virtual: uma experiência musical interativa e colaborativa. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos (SBSC), pages 132-145. SBC. DOI: 10.5753/sbsc.2022.19482.
Biaett, V. and Richards, G. (2020). Event experiences: measurement and meaning, volume 12. Taylor & Francis. DOI: 10.1080/19407963.2020.1820146.
Brand, G., Sloboda, J., Saul, B., and Hathaway, M. (2012). The reciprocal relationship between jazz musicians and audiences in live performances: A pilot qualitative study. Psychology of Music, 40(5):634-651. DOI: 10.1177/0305735612448509.
Broder, N. (1960). The beginnings of the orchestra. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 13(1/3):174-180. DOI: 10.1525/jams.1960.13.1-3.03a00130.
Brown, A. (2013). All the world’s a stage: Venues and settings, and their role in shaping patterns of arts participation. The Audience Experience, pages 49-66. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv36xvtc6.9.
Brown, S. C. and Knox, D. (2017). Why go to pop concerts? the motivations behind live music attendance. Musicae Scientiae, 21(3):233-249. DOI: 10.1177/1029864916650719.
Burns, L. A. (2016). The concept album as visual—sonic—textual spectacle: The transmedial storyworld of coldplay’s mylo xyloto. IASPM journal, 6(2):91-116. DOI: 10.5429/2079-3871(2016)v6i2.6en.
Cerratto-Pargman, T., Rossitto, C., and Barkhuus, L. (2014). Understanding audience participation in an interactive theater performance. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, pages 608-617. DOI: 10.1145/2639189.2641213.
Cheng, K., Koda, K., and Masuko, S. (2022). Reimagining the stadium spectator experience using augmented reality and visual positioning system. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), pages 786-787. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct57072.2022.00167.
Cook, N. (2012). Music as performance. In The cultural study of music, pages 184-194. Routledge. Available at:[link].
Dashper, K. and Buchmann, A. (2020). Multispecies event experiences: introducing more-than-human perspectives to event studies. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 12(3):293-309. DOI: 10.1080/19407963.2019.1701791.
Dearn, L. K. and Price, S. M. (2016). Sharing music: Social and communal aspects of concert-going. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network, 9(2). DOI: 10.31165/nk.2016.92.428.
DeNora, T. (2000). Music in everyday life. Cambridge university press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489433.
Dolasinski, M. J., Roberts, C., Reynolds, J., and Johanson, M. (2021). Defining the field of events. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 45(3):553-572. DOI: 10.1177/1096348020978266.
Duvignau, R. (2025). Kahoot vs. mentimeter for active learning in computer and engineering education-who won? who's next? In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, pages 214-220. DOI: 10.1145/3724363.3729086.
Edelman, D. C. and Singer, M. (2015). Competing on customer journeys. Harvard business review, 93(11):88-100. Available at:[link].
Getz, D. (2007). Event studies theory, research and policy for planned events. Routledge. Available at:[link].
Getz, D. and Page, S. J. (2016). Progress and prospects for event tourism research. Tourism management, 52:593-631. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.03.007.
Getz, D. and Page, S. J. (2019). Event studies: Theory, research and policy for planned events. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429023002.
Gomes, G., Conte, T., Castro, T., and Gadelha, B. (2023). Engagement, participation, and liveness: Understanding audience interaction in technology-based events. In International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS) (2), pages 264-275. DOI: 10.5220/0011848600003467.
Gomes, G., Conte, T., and Gadelha, B. (2025a). Evaluating the impact of interaction technology on audience experience across event contexts: An empirical study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, pages 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2025.2482738.
Gomes, G., Nogueira, F., Kienen, J. G., Scarambone, B., Scarambone, D., Galvao, L., Lauschner, T., Steinmacher, I., Conte, T., and Gadelha, B. (2025b). Beyond applause: A collaborative and interactive experience in piano concerts. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas Colaborativos (SBSC), pages 177-189. SBC. DOI: 10.5753/sbsc.2025.8661.
Haimson, O. L. and Tang, J. C. (2017). What makes live events engaging on facebook live, periscope, and snapchat. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 48-60. DOI: 10.1145/3025453.3025642.
Hödl, O. and Turchet, L. (2025). The tmap framework: describing the design space of technology-mediated audience participation in live music. IEEE Access. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3543064.
Jacucci, G., Oulasvirta, A., Ilmonen, T., Evans, J., and Salovaara, A. (2007). Comedia: Mobile group media for active spectatorship. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1273-1282. DOI: 10.1145/1240624.1240817.
Jia, X., Kong, Z., Gao, H., and Wang, S. (2024). Intelligent concert light stick control system based on internet of things. In 2024 3rd International Conference on Electronics and Information Technology (EIT), pages 448-451. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/EIT63098.2024.10762122.
Kim, S.-Y. (2017). Liveness: Performance of ideology and technology in the changing media environment. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.76.
Latulipe, C., Carroll, E. A., and Lottridge, D. (2011). Love, hate, arousal and engagement: exploring audience responses to performing arts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1845-1854. DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979210.
Lee, S. W., Willette, A., Koutra, D., and Lasecki, W. S. (2019). The effect of social interaction on facilitating audience participation in a live music performance. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pages 108-120. DOI: 10.1145/3325480.3325509.
Lo, W. H., Zollmann, S., and Regenbrecht, H. (2021). Xrspectator: Immersive, augmented sports spectating. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pages 1-2. DOI: 10.1145/3489849.3489930.
Mackellar, J. (2013). Event audiences and expectations. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203098080.
Martins, F., França, C., Paixão, P., Martinho, D. V., Campos, P., Gouveia, B., Lopes, H., Ihle, A., Marques, E., and Gouveia, É. R. (2023). Emerging technologies to promote fans interaction in football events: a systematic review. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2023(1):6667260. DOI: 10.1155/2023/6667260.
Martins, G., Gomes, G., Conceição, J. L., Marques, L., da Silva, D., Castro, T., Gadelha, B., and de Freitas, R. (2021). Bumbometer digital crowd game: collaboration through competition in entertainment events. Journal on Interactive Systems, 12(1):294-307. DOI: 10.5753/jis.2021.1998.
McPherson, G. E. and Schubert, E. (2022). Enhancing music performance appraisal. The Oxford handbook of music performance, 2:103-134. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190058869.013.7.
Mueser, D. and Vlachos, P. (2018). Almost like being there? a conceptualisation of live-streaming theatre. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 9(2):183-203. DOI: 10.1108/IJEFM-05-2018-0030.
Oliver Hödl, Christoph Bartmann, F. K. C. L. P. P. (2020). Large-scale audience participation in live music using smartphones. Journal of New Music Research, 49(2):192-207. DOI: 10.1080/09298215.2020.1722181.
O'Neill, S. and Sloboda, J. (2017). Responding to performers. Musicians in the Making: Pathways to Creative Performance, 1:322. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199346677.003.0023.
Otsu, K., Yuan, J., Fukuda, H., Kobayashi, Y., Kuno, Y., and Yamazaki, K. (2021). Enhancing multimodal interaction between performers and audience members during live music performances. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-6. DOI: 10.1145/3411763.3451584.
O’Brien, H. and Cairns, P. (2015). An empirical evaluation of the user engagement scale (ues) in online news environments. Information Processing & Management, 51(4):413-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2015.03.003.
O’Brien, H. L., Cairns, P., and Hall, M. (2018). A practical approach to measuring user engagement with the refined user engagement scale (ues) and new ues short form. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 112:28-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.01.004.
Pitts, S. E., Dobson, M. C., Gee, K., and Spencer, C. P. (2013). Views of an audience: Understanding the orchestral concert experience from player and listener perspectives. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 10(2):65-95. Available at:[link].
Radbourne, J., Glow, H., and Johanson, K. (2013). The audience experience: A critical analysis of audiences in the performing arts. Intellect. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv36xvtc6.
Robinson, R. B., Rheeder, R., Klarkowski, M., and Mandryk, R. L. (2022). Chat has no chill: A novel physiological interaction for engaging live streaming audiences. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-18. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3501934.
Salovaara, A., Nelimarkka, M., Kuikkaniemi, K., and Jacucci, G. (2021). Augmenting the performer-audience live participation in professional event productions. In Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, pages 186-196. DOI: 10.1145/3464327.3464328.
Storvang, P., Mortensen, B., and Clarke, A. H. (2017). Using workshops in business research: A framework to diagnose, plan, facilitate and analyze workshops. In Collaborative research design: Working with business for meaningful findings, pages 155-174. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-5008-4_7.
Vasconcelos, V., Amazonas, M., Castro, T., Freitas, R., and Gadelha, B. (2018). Watch or immerse? redefining your role in big shows. In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-9. DOI: 10.1145/3274192.3274233.
Veerasawmy, R. and Iversen, O. S. (2012). Bannerbattle: introducing crowd experience to interaction design. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making sense through design, pages 228-237. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2399016.2399052.
Veerasawmy, R. and McCarthy, J. (2014). When noise becomes voice: designing interactive technology for crowd experiences through imitation and invention. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 18:1601-1615. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-014-0761-8.
Wald-Fuhrmann, M., Egermann, H., Czepiel, A., O’Neill, K., Weining, C., Meier, D., Tschacher, W., Uhde, F., Toelle, J., and Tröndle, M. (2021). Music listening in classical concerts: Theory, literature review, and research program. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:638783. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.638783.
Webb, A. M., Wang, C., Kerne, A., and Cesar, P. (2016). Distributed liveness: Understanding how new technologies transform performance experiences. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 432-437. DOI: 10.1145/2818048.2819974.
Wu, Y., Zhang, L., Bryan-Kinns, N., and Barthet, M. (2017). Open symphony: Creative participation for audiences of live music performances. IEEE MultiMedia, 24(1):48-62. DOI: 10.1109/MMUL.2017.19.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, volume 5. sage. Available at:[link].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Genildo Gomes, Fernando Nogueira, João Gustavo Kienen, Bernardo Scarambone, Desiree Scarambone, Leandro Galvão, Tanara Lauschner, Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Conte, Bruno Gadelha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

