Unsafe by Design? Examining Age Assurance Mechanisms and Child Protection on Digital Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/jbcs.2026.8248Keywords:
Age Assurance, Social Media Platforms, Child Online Safety, RegulationAbstract
Given the ease of unsupervised access and the growing risks faced by minors online, safeguarding children’s digital rights has become increasingly urgent. As personal data becomes a major economic asset, governments worldwide are enforcing stricter age assurance requirements for digital platforms. This study investigates age assurance mechanisms on the social media platforms most frequently used by Brazilian children and adolescents. First, we created test accounts and analyzed the terms of use and age assurance procedures of YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Second, we examined contributions submitted to a public consultation on platform regulation conducted by the Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (CGI.br) to identify expert concerns and expectations regarding age assurance. Third, we conducted a systematic mapping study of age verification research published between 2020 and 2025, examining categories of age verification methods, data modalities, evaluation approaches, and evidence regarding their effectiveness. Our findings indicate that platforms in Brazil largely mirror patterns observed in previous international studies, relying on mechanisms that can be easily circumvented. The literature similarly reveals the absence of a universally effective solution, highlighting trade-offs between robustness, privacy, and inclusion. Rather than proposing a new age-assurance mechanism, we provide a contextual and integrative examination of existing approaches within the Brazilian regulatory and child-protection context. Taken together, the results suggest that age assurance should not be understood solely as a technical challenge, but as a broader socio-technical issue involving child protection, data governance, and digital rights.
Downloads
References
Albuquerque, N., Valença, G., and Falcão, T. P. (2024). Investigating manipulative design on social media platforms-the case of kidinfluencers. Journal on Interactive Systems, 15(1):860-874. DOI: 10.5753/jis.2024.4271.
ANPD (2026). Age assurance mechanisms. Technology radar, n.5, ANPD, Brasília, DF. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-05-07.
Brasil (1990). Lei nº 8.069, de 13 de julho de 1990: Estatuto da criança e do adolescente. Available at: [link].
Brasil (2018). Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. lei geral de proteção de dados pessoais (lgpd). Available at: [link].
Brasil (2025). Lei nº 15.211, de 17 de setembro de 2025: Estatuto digital da criança e do adolescente. Available at: [link].
Carvalho, R. G. L. and Marques-Neto, H. T. (2024). Crianças e propagandas no TikTok: identificando publicidade infantil na rede social TikTok. In Proceedings of the 30th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia 2024), pages 98-105. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação. DOI: 10.5753/webmedia.2024.242912.
Cetic.br (2026). Estudo inédito mapeia práticas de aferição de idade em serviços digitais no brasil. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Cetic.br and NIC.br (2024). Tic kids online brasil 2024: principais resultados. Technical report, Núcleo de Informação e Coordenação do Ponto BR (NIC.br). Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Coelho, R. R. and de Oliveira, J. (2021). How twitter has been used for share pedophilia content in 2020. In Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web. 27 September 2021. DOI: 10.1145/3470482.3479473.
Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (CGI.br) (2025). Diálogos cgi.br: Consulta sobre regulação de plataformas digitais. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Cruz, M. F. d. (2025). O enriquecimento de dados de crianças e adolescentes na regulamentação das plataformas de mídia social: entre a proteção da privacidade e os desafios regulamentares. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Direito), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Available at: [link].
Curley, C. (2020). 2020 technical report: A review of age verification mechanism for 10 social media apps. CyberSafeIreland. DOI: 10.21427/n1ja-1626.
Eltaher, F., Gajula, R. K., Miralles-Pechuán, L., Thorpe, C., and McKeever, S. (2025). The digital loophole: Evaluating the effectiveness of child age verification methods on social media. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy (ICISSP), volume 2, pages 213-222. SciTePress. DOI: 10.5220/0013248300003899.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2022). Regulation (eu) 2022/2065 of the european parliament and of the council of 19 october 2022 on a single market for digital services and amending directive 2000/31/ec (digital services act). Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Faraz, A. et al. (2022). Child safety and protection in the online gaming ecosystem. IEEE Access, 10:115895-115913. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3218415.
Farthing, R. et al. (2021). Age appropriate digital services for young people: Major reforms. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 10(4):40-48. DOI: 10.1109/MCE.2021.3053772.
Federal Trade Commission (1998). Children's online privacy protection rule (coppa). Available at: [link] Accessed: 2025-07.
GDPR.info (2016). Gdpr information portal. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2025-07.
Hartung, P. (2020). The children's rights-by-design standard for data use by tech companies. Good governance of children's data project, issue brief no. 5, UNICEF Office of Global Insight and Policy. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Hasebrink, U., Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., and Ólafsson, K. (2008). Comparing children's online opportunities and risks across europe: Cross-national comparisons for eu kids online. Deliverable d3.2, 2nd edition, EU Kids Online, London School of Economics and Political Science. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Hymas, C. (2024). Social media firms to be forced to `drive out' under-age users. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2025-01-08.
Jarvie, C. and Renaud, K. (2024). Online age verification: Government legislation, supplier responsibilization, and public perceptions. Children, 11(9):1068. DOI: 10.3390/children11091068.
Kemp, S. (2025). Digital 2025: Global overview report. Available at: [link] Accessed: 2026-09-14.
Laterça, P. (2022). Privacidade e Proteção de Dados de Crianças e Adolescentes. Obliq Press, Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Available at:[link].
Livingstone, S. and Stoilova, M. (2021). The 4cs: Classifying online risk to children. Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI). DOI: 10.21241/ssoar.71817.
Livingstone, S. and Sylwander, K. R. (2025). There is no right age! the search for age-appropriate ways to support children’s digital lives and rights. Journal of Children and Media, 19(1):6-12. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2024.2435015.
Mascheroni, G. (2020). Datafied childhoods: Contextualising datafication in everyday life. Current Sociology, 68(6):798-813. DOI: 10.1177/0011392118807534.
Ngai, E. W. T., Tao, S. S. C., and Moon, K. K. L. (2015). Social media research: Theories, constructs, and conceptual frameworks. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1):33-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004.
Pasquale, L., Zippo, P., Curley, C., O’Neill, B., and Mongiello, M. (2022). Digital age of consent and age verification: Can they protect children? IEEE Software, 39(3):50-57. DOI: 10.1109/MS.2020.3044872.
Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., and Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and Software Technology, 64:1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., and Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.024.
Staksrud, E. and Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants? Information, Communication & Society, 12(3):364-387. DOI: 10.1080/13691180802635455.
Theodoro, A. and Valença, G. (2025). Entre o acesso e a proteção - um estudo sobre verificação de idade e segurança infantil em plataformas digitais. In Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, pages 211-219, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC. DOI: 10.5753/webmedia.2025.16050.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 André de Andrade Theodoro, George Valença, Átila Rodrigues

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

