FASED: A Framework for Data Ecosystems Health Evaluation

Authors

  • Glória de Fátima B. Lima Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
  • Marcelo Iury S. Oliveira Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • Bernadette Farias Lóscio Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/jidm.2022.2511

Keywords:

Data Ecosystems, Data Ecosystem Health, Quality

Abstract

The growing availability of data in digital media has contributed to the creation of a large number of data ecosystems. However, having successful Data Ecosystem is still a challenge. In order to prevent the failure of a Data Ecosystem and ensure its survival, evaluating its health becomes fundamental. In a general way, the health of a Data Ecosystem can be defined as its ability to grow and survive over time. Indicators such as productivity, robustness, niche creation and sustainability can be employed to evaluate the health of a Data Ecosystem. In this paper, we propose a framework for data Ecosystem health evaluation composed of a set of indicators and metrics, which assess the Data Ecosystem’s current state and its ability to stay healthy over time. The results obtained when using the proposed framework offers evidence to assist in decision making on how data has being published and consumed in a Data Ecosystem, as well as to evaluate which ecosystems are more prosperous or need more investments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almeida, H. R., de Magalhães, E. M. C., de Moura, H. P., Teixeira Filho, J. G. d. A., Cappelli, C., and Martins, L. M. F. Evaluation of a maturity model for agile governance in ict using focus group. In Proceedings of the annual conference on Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems: Information Systems: A Computer Socio-Technical Perspective-Volume 1. Brazilian Computer Society, pp. 3, 2015.

Barry, M.-L., Steyn, H., and Brent, A. Determining the most important factors for sustainable energy technology selection in africa: Application of the focus group technique. PICMET 08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering Technology, July, 2008.

Botelho, R. G. and de Oliveira, C. d. C. Literaturas branca e cinzenta: uma revisão conceitual. Ciência da Informação 44 (3), 2015.

Carvalho, I., Campos, F., Braga, R., David, J. M. N., Stroelle, V., and Araujo, M. A. Heal me-an architecture for health software ecosystem evaluation. 2017 IEEE/ACM Joint 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Systems-of-Systems and 11th Workshop on Distributed Software Development, Software Ecosystems and Systems-of-Systems (JSOS), 2017.

Chapin III, F. S., Matson, P. A., and Vitousek, P. M. The ecosystem concept. In Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology. Springer, pp. 3–22, 2011.

Chapin III, F. S., Torn, M. S., and Tateno, M. Principles of ecosystem sustainability. American Naturalist, 1996.

Chen, M., Mao, S., and Liu, Y. Big data: A survey. Mobile networks and applications 19 (2): 171–209, 2014.

Chiara, I. G. D. Grupo de foco. Métodos qualitativos de pesquisa em Ciência da Informação, 2005.

Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., and Hovy, E. Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity 15 (1, 2): 1–9, 2010.

Costanza, R. Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. Ecosystem health: New goals for environmental management, 1992. Ecosystem health: New goals for environmental management. 239–256.

Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., and Parkhimovich, O. Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly 33 (1): 15–27, 2016.

den Hartigh, E., Tol, M., and Visscher, W. The health measurement of a business ecosystem. European Network on Chaos and Complexity Research and Management Practice Meeting, 2006.

Dhungana, D., Groher, I., Schludermann, E., and Biffl, S. Software ecosystems vs. natural ecosystems: learning from the ingenious mind of nature. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume, 2010.

Easterbrook, S., Singer, J., Storey, M.-A., and Damian, D. Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, 2008.

Franch, X. and Carvallo, J. P. Using quality models in software package selection. IEEE software 20 (1): 34–41, 2003.

Franco-Bedoya, O., Ameller, D., Costal, D., and Franch, X. Queso a quality model for open source software ecosystems. International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications, 2014.

Franco Bedoya, Ó. H., Ameller, D., Costal Costa, D., and Franch Gutiérrez, J. Queso v2.0 a quality model for open source software ecosystems: List of measures, 2016.

Garcia, V. C. RiSE reference model for software reuse adoption in Brazilian companies. Ph.D. thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2010.

Gelhaar, J., Gross, T., and Otto, B. A taxonomy for data ecosystems. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. pp. 6113, 2021.

Group, O. G. W. Eight principles of open government data, Open Government Working Group, 2007. [link]. Accessed in 20-April-2016.

Hanssen, G. K. and Dybå, T. Theoretical foundations of software ecosystems. IWSECO@ ICSOB , 2012.

Hevner, A. and Chatterjee, S. Design science research in information systems. Design research in information systems, 2010.

Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. Keystones and dominators: Framing the operational dynamics of business ecosystems. The Operational Dynamics of Business Ecosystems, 2002.

Jansen, S. Measuring the health of open source software ecosystems: Beyond the scope of project health. Information and Software Technology 56 (11): 1508–1519, 2014.

Kontio, J., Lehtola, L., and Bragge, J. Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004.

Lis, D. and Otto, B. Data governance in data ecosystems–insights from organizations, 2020.

Luna, A. J. H. d. O. MAnGve: Um Modelo para Governança Ágil em TIC. M.S. thesis, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2009.

Manikas, K. and Hansen, K. M. Reviewing the health of software ecosystems–a conceptual framework proposal. International Workshop on Software Ecosystems, 2013.

Nuseibeh, B. Weaving together requirements and architectures. Computer 34 (3): 115–119, 2001.

Oliveira, M. I. S., Lima, G. d. F., and Lóscio, B. F. Investigations into data ecosystems: A systematic mapping study. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2019.

Oliveira, M. I. S. and Lóscio, B. F. What is a data ecosystem? Digital Government Research, 2018.

Oliveira, M. I. S., Oliveira, L. E. R., Batista, M. G. R., and Lóscio, B. F. Towards a meta-model for data ecosystems. International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, 2018.

Oxford Dictionary. Definition of framework, 2019.

Pollock, R. Building the (open) data ecosystem. Open knowledge foundation Blog vol. 31, 2011.

Silva, E., Oliveira, M., Oliveira, E., da Gama, K., and Lóscio, B. Um survey sobre plataformas de mediação de dados para internet das coisas. In Anais do XLII Seminário Integrado de Software e Hardware. SBC, pp. 95–106, 2015.

Soto, M. and Ciolkowski, M. The qualoss open source assessment model measuring the performance of open source communities. International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2009.

Thomas, L. D. and Autio, E. The processes of ecosystem emergence. Imperial College Business School, University of London, 2014.

Ubaldi, B. Open government data. OECD, 2013.

Zaganelli, B. M., Nisenbaum, M. A., Marques, S. B., and Olinto, G. O grupo focal na ciência da informação. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 2015.

Zhang, J., Sun, J., Zhang, R., Zhang, Y., and Hu, X. Privacy-preserving social media data outsourcing. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, pp. 1106–1114, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-21

How to Cite

B. Lima, G. de F., S. Oliveira, M. I., & Farias Lóscio, B. (2022). FASED: A Framework for Data Ecosystems Health Evaluation. Journal of Information and Data Management, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5753/jidm.2022.2511

Issue

Section

SBBD 2021 Short papers - Extended papers