Can Information Systems Help the Fight Against Corruption Through Transparency Features? Systematic Mapping of the Literature


  • Tadeu Modeira de Classe Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
  • Henrique Prado de Sá Sousa Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO)
  • Ronney Moreira de Castro Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)



Corruption, Information systems, Systematic mapping of the literature, Transparency


Context: Corruption is a problem that follows the evolution of humanity, taking root in human society and causing global problems in the form of social inequality, the precariousness of public services, and the exhaustion of democracy. In this scenario, transparency is a necessary action against corruption by providing more precise and complete information so that society can understand and supervise government actions. Public access to those information places Information Systems (ISs) at the center of transparency proposals as tools that can help fight against corruption. Problem: Nevertheless, understanding, designing, and deploying ISs with such a purpose is a challenge because they need distinct features. Solution: Therefore, in this paper, we explored research that helps to understand how ISs could help to face corruption considering transparency aspects, such as features, technologies, and application contexts. Method: We described and used a systematic mapping of the literature (SML) for that. Summary Results: In the search step, we found 129 primary studies but, after evaluation criteria, we selected only 15 of them as relevant to the research. The results point to potential technologies and features that can make up these ISs, such as data openness and privacy, information traceability, data availability, real-time data, and accountability. Contributions to IS: Thus, this study brings contributions to the SI area by identifying aspects to the project of ISs focused on fighting against corruption by supporting information transparency. In addition, beyond the social relevance of this theme, the research is aligned to the GranDSI-BR 2016-2026.


Download data is not yet available.


[Abreu e Classe 2021] Abreu, V. S. e Classe, T. M. (2021). Análise dos principais crimes de corrupção no brasil: Uma busca sistemática pelo google trends. RelaTe-DIA, 14(1):1–17.

[Akaba et al. 2020] Akaba, T. I., Norta, A., Udokwu, C., e Draheim, D. (2020). A framework for the adoption of blockchain-based e-procurement systems in the public sector: A case study of nigeria. Responsible Design, Implementation and Use of Information and Communication Technology, 12066:3.

[Alshamsi et al. 2019] Alshamsi, O., Ameen, A., Isaac, O., Khalifa, G., e Bhumic, A. (2019). Examining the impact of dubai smart government characteristics on user satisfaction. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng, 8(2S10):319–327.

[Ameen e Ahmad 2013] Ameen, A. B. e Ahmad, K. (2013). A conceptual framework of financial information systems to reduce corruption. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 54(1):59–72.

[Aminah et al. 2018] Aminah, S., Ditari, Y., Kumaralalita, L., Hidayanto, A. N., Phusavat, K., e Anussornnitisarn, P. (2018). E-procurement system success factors and their impact on transparency perceptions: perspectives from the supplier side. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 14(2):177–199.

[Araujo e Taher 2014] Araujo, R. e Taher, Y. (2014). Refining it requirements for government-citizen co-participation support in public service design and delivery. In Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, volume 1, p. 61–72, Krems. DonauUniversität Krems.

[Araujo et al. 2013] Araujo, R., Taher, Y., Heuvel, W.-J. v. d., e Cappelli, C. (2013). Evolving government-citizen ties in public service design and delivery. In Electronic Government and Electronic Participation-Joint Proceedings of Ongoing Research of IFIP EGOV and IFIP ePart 2013, p. 19–26, Bonn. Gesellschaft für Informatik eV.

[Aziz et al. 2012] Aziz, N. M., Salleh, H., e Mustafa, N. K. F. (2012). People critical success factors (csfs) in information technology/information system (it/is) implementation. Journal of Design+ Built, 5(1).

[Barreto et al. 2018] Barreto, P., Salgado, L., e Viterbo, J. (2018). Transparency communication strategies in human-data interaction. In Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, SBSI’18, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

[Basili 1992] Basili, V. R. (1992). Software modeling and measurement: the goal/question/metric paradigm. Technical Report CS-TR-2956, UMIACS-TR-92-9, University of Maryland.

[Bertot et al. 2010] Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., e Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using icts to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government information quarterly, 27(3):264–271.

[Biason e Livianu 2019] Biason, R. C. e Livianu, R. (2019). A corrupção na História do Brasil. Mackenzie, São Paulo.

[Borowiak 2011] Borowiak, C. T. (2011). Accountability and democracy: The pitfalls and promise of popular control. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[Boscarioli et al. 2017] Boscarioli, C., Araujo, R. M., e Maciel, R. S. P. (2017). I GranDSI-BR – Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016-2026. Brazilian Computer Society (SBC), Rio Grande do Sul.

[Brei 1996] Brei, Z. A. (1996). A corrupção: causas, consequências e soluções para o problema. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 30(3):103–a.

[Brusca et al. 2018] Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., e Aversano, N. (2018). Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: an international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(5):486–504.

[Cappelli e Leite 2008] Cappelli, C. e Leite, J. (2008). Transparência de processos organizacionais. II Simpósio Internacional de Transparência nos Negócios, Universidade Federal Fluminense, LATEC, Niterói, RJ, Brasil.

[Chung e Leite 2009] Chung, L. e Leite, J. C. S. d. P. (2009). On non-functional requirements in software engineering. In Conceptual modeling: Foundations and applications, p. 363–379. Springer.

[Chvalkovská et al. 2010] Chvalkovská, J., Marková, K., e Skuhrovec, J. (2010). The e-government tools as democracy watchdogs: Public e-procurement in the czech republic. In ICEG2006-Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on e-Government: ICEG2006, p. 193, Cape Town. Academic Conferences Limited.

[Classe et al. 2022] Classe, T. M. d., Sousa, H. P. d. S., e Castro, R. M. (2022). How could information systems support transparency to face corruption? systematic mapping of the literature. In XVIII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems, SBSI, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.

[Cockcroft 2012] Cockcroft, L. (2012). Global corruption: Money, power and ethics in the modern world. Bloomsbury Publishing, London.

[Cunha Filho 2004] Cunha Filho, M. C. (2004). O que sabemos sobre transparência pública? uma revisão bibliográfica das abordagens normativas, conceitualistas e empírica. Revista da CGU, 10(16):20.

[Cysneiros e Leite 2020] Cysneiros, L. M. e Leite, J. C. S. d. P. (2020). Non-functional requirements orienting the development of socially responsible software. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, p. 335–342. Springer.

[Dachyar e Karenina 2020] Dachyar, M. e Karenina, F. (2020). E-procurement process reengineering for prohibiting the corruption initiatives by proposing a real-time and integrated bidding solution. In 2nd African International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, IEOM 2020, p. 829–840, Harare. IEOM Society.

[Damm et al. 2019] Damm, I. A., Shchedrin, N. V., Ronzhina, O. V., Akunchenko, E. A., e Korkhov, A. V. (2019). Anti-corruption potential of openness and accessibility of municipal legal acts. Journal of the Siberian Federal University. Humanitarian sciences, 12(3):378–391.

[Delima e Dachyar 2020] Delima, P. M. e Dachyar, M. (2020). Advancing the e-tendering information system to counter corruption by proposing anti-corruption smart tools. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Applied Engineering (ICAE), p. 1–8, Batam. IEEE.

[Dias et al. 2021] Dias, R., Cardoso, H., Cruz, E. F., e da Cruz, A. R. (2021). A blockchain-based platform for reliably tracing political contacts. In 2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), p. 1–6, Chaves. IEEE.

[Dumisa e Amao 2015] Dumisa, S. e Amao, O. B. (2015). The utility of moral philosophy and professional ethics in the fight against corruption in south africa: any role for ubuntu? Ubuntu: Journal of Conflict and Social Transformation, 4(1):85–111.

[Dupuy e Neset 2018] Dupuy, K. e Neset, S. (2018). The cognitive psychology of corruption. Micro-level Explanations for Unethical Behavior, U4, U4(2018:3):2.

[Fantaye 2004] Fantaye, D. K. (2004). Fighting corruption and embezzlement in third world countries. The Journal of criminal law, 68(2):170–176.

[Filgueiras 2009] Filgueiras, F. (2009). A tolerância à corrupção no brasil: uma antinomia entre normas morais e prática social. Opinião Pública, 15:386–421.

[Fleiss et al. 2013] Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., e Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. john wiley & sons, New Jersey.

[Gangadharan e Swami 2004] Gangadharan, G. R. e Swami, S. N. (2004). Business intelligence systems: design and implementation strategies. In 26th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces, 2004., p. 139–144. IEEE.

[GER-PUC 2010] GER-PUC (2010). Grupo de engenharia de software – puc-rio. Disponível em: , Acessado em 25/08/2022.

[Ghazanfar e May 2000] Ghazanfar, S. e May, K. S. (2000). Third world corruption: A brief survey of the issues. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 25(3):351.

[Gildenhuys 2004] Gildenhuys, J. S. H. (2004). Ethics and professionalism: The battle against public corruption. African Sun Media.

[Giurge et al. 2021] Giurge, L. M., van Dijke, M., Zheng, M. X., e De Cremer, D. (2021). Does power corrupt the mind? the influence of power on moral reasoning and self-interested behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(4):101288.

[Godoi 2022] Godoi, C. E. T. (2022). The theoretical complexity of corruption. Advances in Sociology Research, p. 1.

[Gomes et al. 2018] Gomes, W., Amorim, P. K. D. F., e Almada, M. P. (2018). Novos desafios para a ideia de transparência pública. E-Compós, 21(2):1–21.

[Gritzalis et al. 2019] Gritzalis, A., Tsohou, A., e Lambrinoudakis, C. (2019). Transparency-enabling information systems: trust relations and privacy concerns in open governance. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 11(3-4):310–332.

[Hinds et al. 2020] Hinds, J., Williams, E. J., e Joinson, A. N. (2020). “it wouldn’t happen to me”: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the cambridge analytica scandal. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 143:102498.

[Hodess 2004] Hodess, R. (2004). Introduction to political corruption. Transparency International: Global Corruption Report 2004.

[Imtiaz e Rahman 2014] Imtiaz, A. e Rahman, M. S. (2014). Integrated land information system: To ensure the transparency and availability of information, in context of bangladesh. In 2014 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information & Communication Technology, p. 1–5, Dhaka. IEEE.

[Jancsics 2014] Jancsics, D. (2014). Interdisciplinary perspectives on corruption. Sociology Compass, 8(4):358–372.

[Johri e Nair 2011] Johri, A. e Nair, S. (2011). The role of design values in information system development for human benefit. Information Technology & People, 24(3):281–302.

[Key 1935] Key, V. O. (1935). The techniques of political graft in the United States. The University of Chicago, Chicago.

[Khan et al. 2021] Khan, A., Krishnan, S., e Dhir, A. (2021). Electronic government and corruption: Systematic literature review, framework, and agenda for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167:120737.

[Kitchenham e Charters 2007] Kitchenham, B. e Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report Tech. Rep. EBSE-2007-01, Keele University, Keele.

[Kumari et al. 2021] Kumari, K., Abbas, J., Rashid, S., et al. (2021). Role of corporate social responsibility in corporate reputation via organizational trust and commitment. Reviews of Management Sciences, 3(2):42–63.

[Kwan et al. 2021] Kwan, D., Cysneiros, L. M., e Leite, J. C. S. d. P. (2021). Towards achieving trust through transparency and ethics. In 2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), p. 82–93. IEEE.

[Landis e Koch 1977] Landis, J. R. e Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 33(1):159–174.

[Leal et al. 2011] Leal, A. L. d. C., Sousa, H. P., Leite, J. C. S. d. P., e Braga, J. L. (2011). Transparência aplicada a modelos de negócio. In CIbSE, p. 321–332.

[Leite e Cappelli 2010] Leite, J. C. S. d. P. e Cappelli, C. (2010). Software transparency. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 2(3):127–139.

[Line et al. 2006] Line, M. B., Nordland, O., Røstad, L., e Tøndel, I. A. (2006). Safety vs security? In PSAM Conference, New Orleans, USA. sn.

[Lyke e Jickling 2002] Lyke, B. e Jickling, M. (2002). Worldcom: The accounting scandal. In Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, August, volume 29, p. 1–6.

[Mamedova 2022] Mamedova, N. A. (2022). Evaluation of information support of national contract systems for the period of 2015-2018. International Journal of Procurement Management, 15(2):182–200.

[Mistry 2012] Mistry, J. J. (2012). The role of egovernance in mitigating corruption. Accounting and the Public Interest, 12(1):137–159.

[MPF 2021] MPF (2021). Ministério público federal. Portal do Combate à Corrupção do MPF. Disponível em: [link], Acessado em 28/10/2021.

[Mutula e Wamukoya 2009] Mutula, S. e Wamukoya, J. M. (2009). Public sector information management in east and southern africa: Implications for foi, democracy and integrity in government. International journal of information management, 29(5):333–341.

[Neves 2013] Neves, O. M. d. C. (2013). Evolução das políticas de governo aberto no brasil. In VI Congresso CONSAD de Gestão Pública, p. 1–21, Brasília. CONSAD.

[Nunes et al. 2017] Nunes, V., Cappelli, C., e Ralha, C. G. (2017). Transparency in Information Systems, p. 73–89. Brazilian Computer Society(SBC), Rio Grande do Sul.

[Nye 1967] Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. American political science review, 61(2):417–427.

[OECD 2003] OECD (2003). The e-government imperative. OECD Publishing. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

[Paula et al. 2011] Paula, M., Ribeiro, F., Chaves, M., Rodrigues, S., e Souza, J. (2011). A visualização de informação e a transparência de dados públicos. In Anais do VII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, p. 384–395, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC.

[Pope 2007] Pope, J. D. (2007). The third phase in the fight against corruption: Implementation and comparative administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 10(1):75–83.

[Samuel 2010] Samuel, Y. (2010). Organizational pathology: Life and death of organizations. Transaction publishers.

[Santos et al. 2007] Santos, C. M. d. C., Pimenta, C. A. d. M., e Nobre, M. R. C. (2007). A estratégia pico para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 15:508–511.

[Santos Leite et al. 2021] Santos Leite, B. M., Nishijima, M., Sarti, F. M., e Chaim, M. L. (2021). An analysis of the siclom information system employing misuse case diagrams. Health Policy and Technology, 10(4):100576.

[Silva et al. 2019] Silva, Á. V., Oliveira, P. H. L., Costa, H. H. A. X., e Júnior, P. A. P. (2019). Convênios e contratos de repasse do governo federal: Uma análise comparativa das aplicações fiscalizabr e sisconv. iSys-Brazilian Journal of Information Systems, 12(2):60–88.

[Sladic et al. 2021] Sladic, G., Milosavljevic, B., Nikolic, S., Sladic, D., e Radulovic, A. (2021). A blockchain solution for securing real property transactions: A case study for serbia. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(1):35.

[Sousa e Leite 2017] Sousa, H. P. d. S. e Leite, J. C. S. d. P. (2017). Toward an organizational alignment modeling language: the human resource competency perspective. In 2017 IEEE 19th conference on business informatics (CBI), volume 1, p. 277–286. IEEE.

[TI 2020] TI (2020). Índice de percepção da corrupção 2020. Transparência Internacional. Disponível em: [link], Acessado em 06/10/2021.

[Wahid e Sein 2014] Wahid, F. e Sein, M. K. (2014). Steering institutionalization through institutional work: The case of an eprocurement system in indonesian local government. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p.4264–4274, Hawaii. IEEE.

[Yadav 1983] Yadav, S. B. (1983). Determining an organization’s information requirements: A state of the art survey. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 14(3):3–20.

[Zaffaroni 1990] Zaffaroni, E. R. (1990). La corrupción; su perspectiva lationoamericana. Criminologia crítica. Belém, Edições Cejup, 1(1):1.

[Zhang e Zhang 2009] Zhang, J. e Zhang, Z. (2009). Applying e-government information system for anti-corruption strategy. In 2009 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government, p. 112–115, Nanchang. IEEE.



How to Cite

Modeira de Classe, T., Prado de Sá Sousa, H., & Moreira de Castro, R. (2023). Can Information Systems Help the Fight Against Corruption Through Transparency Features? Systematic Mapping of the Literature. ISys - Brazilian Journal of Information Systems, 16(1), 4:1 – 4:33.



Extended versions of selected articles