Sejamos Pragmáticos: Pesquisas em Sistemas de Informação com Relevância e Rigor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/isys.2017.352Keywords:
Paradigma pragmático, Pesquisa em Sistemas de Informação, Métodos mistos, Rigor e relevânciaAbstract
O pragmatismo pode ser definido como uma doutrina que considera as coisas a partir de um ponto de vista prático. O pragmatismo prega que a ação e a relevância prática devem ser os pontos chave da pesquisa científica. O paradigma pragmático tem se apresentado como alternativa paradigmática do positivismo e do interpretativismo, possibilitando a solução de problemas inerentes dos paradigmas dominantes, positivismo e interpretativismo. O presente artigo apresenta, a partir de um levantamento bibliográfico, o paradigma pragmático, realizando uma comparação com outros paradigmas, assim como a utilização de métodos quantitativos, qualitativos e mistos, a partir de uma perspectiva de relevância prática com rigor metodológico.
Downloads
Não há dados estatísticos.
Referências
ARENS E. The logic of pragmatic thinking. From Peirce to Habermas, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands. 1994.
BASKERVILLE, Richard; MYERS, Michael D. Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice: Foreword. Mis Quarterly, p. 329-335, 2004. [GS Search]
BENBASAT, Izak; ZMUD, Robert W. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS quarterly, p. 3-16, 1999. [GS Search]
CRESWELL, John W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2013.
CRESWELL, John W.; CLARK, Vicki L. Plano. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications. 2007.
CRONEN; V. Practical theory, practical art, and the pragmatic-systemic account of inquiry. Communication theory, Vol 11 (1), p 14-35, 2001. [GS Search]
DARKE, Peta; SHANKS, Graeme; BROADBENT, Marianne. Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information systems journal, v. 8, n. 4, p. 273-289, 1998. [GS Search]
DAVIS, Gerald F. Do theories of organizations progress?. Organizational Research Methods, v. 13, n. 4, p. 690-709, 2010. [GS Search]
DE ANDRADE, Matheus Lemos et al. A Miopia Paradigmática e os Jogos da Verdade nas Pesquisas de Marketing. REMark, v. 16, n. 3, p. 383, 2017. [GS Search]
DEWEY, J. The development of American pragmatism. In H. S. Thayer (Ed.) (1989), Pragmatism: The classic writings (pp. 23-40). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. 1931.
DIETZ, Jan LG. Understanding and modelling business processes with DEMO. In: ER. 1999. p. 188-202. [GS Search]
FEILZER, Martina Yvonne. Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 6-16, 2010. [GS Search]
FISHMAN, Daniel. The case for pragmatic psychology. NYU Press, 1999.
GALVÃO, Maria Cristiane Barbosa. O levantamento bibliográfico e a pesquisa científica. Fundamentos de epidemiologia. 2ed. A, v. 398, p. 1-377, 2010. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. Meanings of pragmatism: Ways to conduct information systems research. Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems, 2004. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 21, n. 2, p. 135-146, 2012. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. What kind of pragmatism in information systems research. In: AIS SIG Prag inaugural meeting. 2008. [GS Search]
GOLES, Tim; HIRSCHHEIM, Rudy. The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead… long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega, v. 28, n. 3, p. 249-268, 2000. [GS Search]
GUBA, Egon G.; LINCOLN, Yvonna S. Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies. Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education, p. 89-115, 1988.
HEVNER, Alan; CHATTERJEE, Samir. Design research in information systems: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
HEVNER, A. R.; MARCH, S.T.; PARK, J. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quaterly, v. 28, n. 1, p. 75-105, 2004. [GS Search]
JAMES, William. Pragmatism, a New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Popular Lectures. 1907.
KUHN, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Vol. 1962.
KWAN, Becky SC. A cross-paradigm macro-structure analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, v. 45, p. 14-30, 2017. [GS Search]
LAUGHLIN, Richard. Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle-range” thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 8, n. 1, p. 63-87, 1995. [GS Search]
LEE, Allen S. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS quarterly, p. 29-33, 1999. [GS Search]
MACKENZIE, Noella; KNIPE, Sally. Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in educational research, v. 16, n. 2, p. 193-205, 2006. [GS Search]
MEAD, George Herbert. The philosophy of the act. 1938.
MERTENS, Donna M. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications, 2014.
MORGAN, David L. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 1, n. 1, p. 48-76, 2007. [GS Search]
MYERS, Michael D.; AVISON, David. An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. 2002.
O'LEARY, Zina. The essential guide to doing your research project. Sage, 2017.
ORLIKOWSKI, Wanda J.; BAROUDI, Jack J. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-28, 1991. [GS Search]
PARVAIZ, Gohar Saleem et al. Pragmatism for Mixed Method Research at Higher Education Level. Business & Economic Review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 67-79, 2016. [GS Search]
PEIRCE, Charles S. Collected Papers (Vols. 1-8). 1931.
PINTO, Nelson Guilherme Machado et al. A Aproximação De Trabalhos Acadêmicos No Universo Organizacional Nas Ciências Administrativas: Uma Análise Dos Trabalhos Do Encontro Da Associação Nacional De Pós-Graduação E Pesquisa Em Administração De 2014. Revista UNEMAT de Contabilidade, v. 5, n. 9, 2016. [GS Search]
POWELL, Thomas C. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 9, p. 875-888, 2001. [GS Search]
RATHBUN, Brian Christopher. Interviewing and qualitative field methods: pragmatism and practicalities. In: The Oxford handbook of political methodology. 2008.
ROBSON, Colin; MCCARTAN, Kieran. Real world research. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Um discurso sobre as ciências. Porto (Portugal): Afrontamento, 1999. [GS Search]
SCHULTZ, Majken. Reconciling pragmatism and scientific rigor. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 19, n. 3, p. 274-277, 2010. [GS Search]
SHUSTERMAN, Richard. Pragmatism and East‐Asian Thought. Metaphilosophy, v. 35, n. 1‐2, p. 13-43, 2004. [GS Search]
SYMONDS, Jenny E.; GORARD, S. The death of mixed methods: research labels and their casualties. In: British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. 2008. [GS Search]
TASHAKKORI, Abbas; TEDDLIE, Charles. The Past and the Future of Mixed Methods Research: From ‘Methodological Triangulation’ to ‘Mixed Methods Designs’. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, p. 671-701, 2003.
TEDDLIE, Charles; TASHAKKORI, Abbas. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, p. 3-50, 2003.
THAYER, Horace Standish. Meaning and action: A critical history of pragmatism. Hackett Publishing, 1981.
TRAUTH, Eileen M. The choice of qualitative methods in IS research. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, 2001.
ULRICH, Werner. Philosophy for professionals: Towards critical pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 58, n. 8, p. 1109-1113, 2007. [GS Search]
VENKATESH, Viswanath; BROWN, Susan A.; BALA, Hillol. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, v. 37, n. 1, 2013. [GS Search]
WALSHAM, Geoff. Doing interpretive research. European journal of information systems, v. 15, n. 3, p. 320-330, 2006. [GS Search]
WICKS, Andrew C.; FREEMAN, R. Edward. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization science, v. 9, n. 2, p. 123-140, 1998. [GS Search]
BASKERVILLE, Richard; MYERS, Michael D. Special issue on action research in information systems: Making IS research relevant to practice: Foreword. Mis Quarterly, p. 329-335, 2004. [GS Search]
BENBASAT, Izak; ZMUD, Robert W. Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance. MIS quarterly, p. 3-16, 1999. [GS Search]
CRESWELL, John W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications, 2013.
CRESWELL, John W.; CLARK, Vicki L. Plano. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications. 2007.
CRONEN; V. Practical theory, practical art, and the pragmatic-systemic account of inquiry. Communication theory, Vol 11 (1), p 14-35, 2001. [GS Search]
DARKE, Peta; SHANKS, Graeme; BROADBENT, Marianne. Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information systems journal, v. 8, n. 4, p. 273-289, 1998. [GS Search]
DAVIS, Gerald F. Do theories of organizations progress?. Organizational Research Methods, v. 13, n. 4, p. 690-709, 2010. [GS Search]
DE ANDRADE, Matheus Lemos et al. A Miopia Paradigmática e os Jogos da Verdade nas Pesquisas de Marketing. REMark, v. 16, n. 3, p. 383, 2017. [GS Search]
DEWEY, J. The development of American pragmatism. In H. S. Thayer (Ed.) (1989), Pragmatism: The classic writings (pp. 23-40). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. 1931.
DIETZ, Jan LG. Understanding and modelling business processes with DEMO. In: ER. 1999. p. 188-202. [GS Search]
FEILZER, Martina Yvonne. Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 6-16, 2010. [GS Search]
FISHMAN, Daniel. The case for pragmatic psychology. NYU Press, 1999.
GALVÃO, Maria Cristiane Barbosa. O levantamento bibliográfico e a pesquisa científica. Fundamentos de epidemiologia. 2ed. A, v. 398, p. 1-377, 2010. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. Meanings of pragmatism: Ways to conduct information systems research. Action in Language, Organisations and Information Systems, 2004. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, v. 21, n. 2, p. 135-146, 2012. [GS Search]
GOLDKUHL, Göran. What kind of pragmatism in information systems research. In: AIS SIG Prag inaugural meeting. 2008. [GS Search]
GOLES, Tim; HIRSCHHEIM, Rudy. The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead… long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan. Omega, v. 28, n. 3, p. 249-268, 2000. [GS Search]
GUBA, Egon G.; LINCOLN, Yvonna S. Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies. Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education, p. 89-115, 1988.
HEVNER, Alan; CHATTERJEE, Samir. Design research in information systems: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.
HEVNER, A. R.; MARCH, S.T.; PARK, J. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quaterly, v. 28, n. 1, p. 75-105, 2004. [GS Search]
JAMES, William. Pragmatism, a New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, Popular Lectures. 1907.
KUHN, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Vol. 1962.
KWAN, Becky SC. A cross-paradigm macro-structure analysis of research articles in Information Systems. English for Specific Purposes, v. 45, p. 14-30, 2017. [GS Search]
LAUGHLIN, Richard. Empirical research in accounting: alternative approaches and a case for “middle-range” thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 8, n. 1, p. 63-87, 1995. [GS Search]
LEE, Allen S. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. MIS quarterly, p. 29-33, 1999. [GS Search]
MACKENZIE, Noella; KNIPE, Sally. Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in educational research, v. 16, n. 2, p. 193-205, 2006. [GS Search]
MEAD, George Herbert. The philosophy of the act. 1938.
MERTENS, Donna M. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications, 2014.
MORGAN, David L. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of mixed methods research, v. 1, n. 1, p. 48-76, 2007. [GS Search]
MYERS, Michael D.; AVISON, David. An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. 2002.
O'LEARY, Zina. The essential guide to doing your research project. Sage, 2017.
ORLIKOWSKI, Wanda J.; BAROUDI, Jack J. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information systems research, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-28, 1991. [GS Search]
PARVAIZ, Gohar Saleem et al. Pragmatism for Mixed Method Research at Higher Education Level. Business & Economic Review, v. 8, n. 2, p. 67-79, 2016. [GS Search]
PEIRCE, Charles S. Collected Papers (Vols. 1-8). 1931.
PINTO, Nelson Guilherme Machado et al. A Aproximação De Trabalhos Acadêmicos No Universo Organizacional Nas Ciências Administrativas: Uma Análise Dos Trabalhos Do Encontro Da Associação Nacional De Pós-Graduação E Pesquisa Em Administração De 2014. Revista UNEMAT de Contabilidade, v. 5, n. 9, 2016. [GS Search]
POWELL, Thomas C. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations. Strategic management journal, v. 22, n. 9, p. 875-888, 2001. [GS Search]
RATHBUN, Brian Christopher. Interviewing and qualitative field methods: pragmatism and practicalities. In: The Oxford handbook of political methodology. 2008.
ROBSON, Colin; MCCARTAN, Kieran. Real world research. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
SANTOS, Boaventura de Sousa. Um discurso sobre as ciências. Porto (Portugal): Afrontamento, 1999. [GS Search]
SCHULTZ, Majken. Reconciling pragmatism and scientific rigor. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 19, n. 3, p. 274-277, 2010. [GS Search]
SHUSTERMAN, Richard. Pragmatism and East‐Asian Thought. Metaphilosophy, v. 35, n. 1‐2, p. 13-43, 2004. [GS Search]
SYMONDS, Jenny E.; GORARD, S. The death of mixed methods: research labels and their casualties. In: British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. 2008. [GS Search]
TASHAKKORI, Abbas; TEDDLIE, Charles. The Past and the Future of Mixed Methods Research: From ‘Methodological Triangulation’ to ‘Mixed Methods Designs’. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, p. 671-701, 2003.
TEDDLIE, Charles; TASHAKKORI, Abbas. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, p. 3-50, 2003.
THAYER, Horace Standish. Meaning and action: A critical history of pragmatism. Hackett Publishing, 1981.
TRAUTH, Eileen M. The choice of qualitative methods in IS research. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, 2001.
ULRICH, Werner. Philosophy for professionals: Towards critical pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 58, n. 8, p. 1109-1113, 2007. [GS Search]
VENKATESH, Viswanath; BROWN, Susan A.; BALA, Hillol. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, v. 37, n. 1, 2013. [GS Search]
WALSHAM, Geoff. Doing interpretive research. European journal of information systems, v. 15, n. 3, p. 320-330, 2006. [GS Search]
WICKS, Andrew C.; FREEMAN, R. Edward. Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization science, v. 9, n. 2, p. 123-140, 1998. [GS Search]
Downloads
Published
2017-12-24
Como Citar
Silva, H. C. C. da, Siqueira, A. de O., Dornelas, J. S., & Araújo, M. A. V. (2017). Sejamos Pragmáticos: Pesquisas em Sistemas de Informação com Relevância e Rigor. ISys - Revista Brasileira De Sistemas De Informação, 10(4), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.5753/isys.2017.352
Issue
Section
Artigos de Edição Especial
