Interpersonal Trust Among Students in Virtual Learning Environments: A Comprehensive Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2025.6118

Keywords:

Interpersonal Trust, Student Trust, Trust Factors, E-learning, Virtual Learning Environment, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Interpersonal trust is recognized as one of the pillars of student collaboration and successful learning in virtual learning environments (VLEs). In order to identify the factors that influence interpersonal trust among students in VLEs, we conducted this systematic mapping study to investigate attributes, evolutionary phases of trust and resources that support interpersonal trust among students in VLEs. By analyzing 49 articles, we identified 37 attributes that influence the phases of trust acquisition and loss, categorized into four themes: Ability, Integrity, Affinity and Non-Personal Factors. Attributes such as collaborative and ethical behavior, academic skills and higher grades are often used to select colleagues, mainly through recommendation systems and user profiles. To organize our findings, we developed two concept maps that describe the main characteristics of the definitions of trust and the classification of attributes by phases and themes. This work presents significant findings that contribute to building and improving VLEs that promote trust among students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadian, S., Ahmadian, M., and Jalili, M. (2022). A deep learning based trust- and tag-aware recommender system. Neurocomputing, 488:557–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.11.064.

Almekhled, B. and Petrie, H. (2024). The role of privacy and security concerns and trust in online teaching: Experiences of higher education students in the kingdom of saudi arabia. volume 1, page 66 – 77. Cited by: 1. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0012616200003693.

Anwar, M. (2021). Supporting privacy, trust, and personalization in online learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31(4):769–783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00216-0.

Arnado, J. M., Jabal, R. F., Poa, M. R. J. A., and Viray, T. C. (2021). Trust in pandemic-induced online learning: Competitive advantage of closure and reputation. RISE, 10(2):192–217. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17583/rise.2021.7088.

Bachmann, R. (2001). Trust, power and control in trans-organizational relations. Organization studies, 22(2):337–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222007.

Baturay, M. H. and Toker, S. (2019). The comparison of trust in virtual and face-to-face collaborative learning teams. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 20(3):153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.601929.

Berggren, N. and Jordahl, H. (2006). Free to trust: Economic freedom and social capital. Kyklos, 59(2):141–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00324.x.

Bhaskaran, S. and Santhi, B. (2019). An efficient personalized trust based hybrid recommendation (tbhr) strategy for e-learning system in cloud computing. Cluster Computing, 22:1137–1149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1160-5.

Bøe, T. (2018). E-learning technology and higher education: the impact of organizational trust. Tertiary Education and Management, 24:362–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2018.1465991.

Borum, R. (2010). The science of interpersonal trust. Randy Borum, pages 1–79. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., and Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The leadership quarterly, 18(6):606–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006.

Caicedo, M., Camacho, R., Cordero, F. F., García, F., Hernández, H., Rodríguez, J. A. L., Manjarrés, J., Martínez, H., Mendoza, C., Millán, B., et al. (2017). Virtual research and learning communities in latin america: The cevale2ve case. Interciencia, 42(11):733–738. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Chamba-Eras, L., Arruarte, A., and Elorriaga, J. A. (2016). Bayesian networks to predict reputation in virtual learning communities. In 2016 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence (LA-CCI), pages 1–6. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-CCI.2016.7885721.

Chamba-Eras, L., Arruarte, A., and Elorriaga, J. A. (2023). T-vlc: A trust model for virtual learning communities. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(5):847–860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3288363.

Chan, H. P., Zhao, T., and King, I. (2016). Trust-aware peer assessment using multi-armed bandit algorithms. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, pages 899–903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2891080.

Chang, W.-L. (2017). Online training for business plan writing through the world café method: the roles of leadership and trust. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16:313–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-016-0459-y.

Cheung, S. O., Yiu, T. W., and Lam, M. C. (2013). Interweaving trust and communication with project performance. Journal of construction engineering and management, 139(8):941–950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000681.

Choi, O.-K. and Cho, E. (2019). The mechanism of trust affecting collaboration in virtual teams and the moderating roles of the culture of autonomy and task complexity. Computers in Human Behavior, 91:305–315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.032.

Clarke, V. and Braun, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage publications ltd.

Costello, E., Brunton, J., Brown, M., and Daly, L. (2018). In moocs we trust: Learner perceptions of mooc quality via trust and credibility. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(6):214–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8447.

Cruzes, D. S. and Dyba, T. (2011). Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In 2011 international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, pages 275–284. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2011.36.

Currall, S. C. and Epstein, M. J. (2003). The fragility of organizational trust:: Lessons from the rise and fall of enron. Organizational Dynamics, 32(2):193–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(03)00018-4.

Deng, X., Li, H., and Huangfu, F. (2018). A trust-aware neural collaborative filtering for elearning recommendation. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(5):2217–2234. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of conflict resolution, 2(4):265–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401.

Dorobăţ, I., Corbea, A. M. I., and Muntean, M. (2019). Integrating student trust in a conceptual model for assessing learning management system success in higher education: An empirical analysis. IEEE Access, 7:69202–69214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2919100.

Dwivedi, P. and Bharadwaj, K. K. (2013). Effective trust-aware e-learning recommender system based on learning styles and knowledge levels. Journal of Educational Technology Society, 16(4):201–216. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Dwyer, N. and Marsh, S. (2016). How students regard trust in an elearning context. In 2016 14th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), pages 682–685. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PST.2016.7906956.

Elghomary, K. and Bouzidi, D. (2019). Dynamic peer recommendation system based on trust model for sustainable social tutoring in moocs. In 2019 1st International Conference on Smart Systems and Data Science (ICSSD), pages 1–9. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSD47982.2019.9003154.

Elghomary, K., Bouzidi, D., and Daoudi, N. (2019). A comparative analysis of osn and siot trust models for a trust model adapted to moocs platforms. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security, pages 1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3320326.3320335.

Elghomary, K., Bouzidi, D., and Daoudi, N. (2022). Design of a smart mooc trust model: Towards a dynamic peer recommendation to foster collaboration and learner’s engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(05):pp. 36–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i05.27705.

Fachrunnisa, O., Hussain, F., and Chang, E. (2010). State of the art review for trust maintenance in organizations. In 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, pages 574–580. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2010.194.

Feng, C. and Xu, Y. (2020). Case study of collaborative learning in a massive open online course. In 2020 Ninth International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT), pages 47–51. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT50754.2020.00014.

Fox, S., Dimond, J., Irani, L., Hirsch, T., Muller, M., and Bardzell, S. (2017). Social justice and design: Power and oppression in collaborative systems. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW ’17 Companion, page 117–122, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3022198.3022201.

Fujihara, Y. (2013). Toward dependable online peer assessments a concept of the trust manegement on peer assessments. In 2013 IEEE Region 10 Humanitarian Technology Conference, pages 110–111. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/R10-HTC.2013.6669024.

Ghosh, A. K., Whipple, T. W., and Bryan, G. A. (2001). Student trust and its antecedents in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 72(3):322–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2001.11777097.

Golbeck, J. A. (2005). Computing and applying trust in web-based social networks. pages 1–185. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Guo, P., Nasir, M. K. M., and Xu, Y. (2024). Collaborative filtering recommender system for online learning resources with integrated dynamic time weighting and trust value calculation. TEM Journal, 13(2):1352 – 1361. Cited by: 0; All Open Access, Gold Open Access. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM132-49.

Gutierrez, P., Osman, N., Roig, C., and Sierra, C. (2015). Trust-based community assessment. Pattern Recognition Letters, 67:49–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2015.06.016.

Horvat, A., Krsmanovic, M., Dobrota, M., and udanov, M. (2013). Students‘ trust in distance learning: Changes in satisfaction and significance. Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management, 18:47–54. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Jhaver, S., Bruckman, A., and Gilbert, E. (2019). Does transparency in moderation really matter? user behavior after content removal explanations on reddit. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 3(CSCW). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3359252.

Jones, S. and Shah, P. (2021). The tangled ties of trust: A social network perspective on interpersonal trust, pages 205–232. Taylor and Francis Inc.. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449185.

Kähkönen, T., Blomqvist, K., Gillespie, N., and Vanhala, M. (2021). Employee trust repair: A systematic review of 20 years of empirical research and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 130:98–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.019.

Khan, E. A., Cram, A., Wang, X., Tran, K., Cavaleri, M., and Rahman, M. J. (2023). Modelling the impact of online learning quality on students’ satisfaction, trust and loyalty. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(2):281–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2022-0066.

Kitchenham, B. and Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. pages pp. 1–57. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., and Brereton, O. P. (2011). Using mapping studies as the basis for further research–a participant-observer case study. Information and Software Technology, 53(6):638–651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.12.011.

Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., and Brereton, P. (2015). Evidence-based software engineering and systematic reviews, volume 4. CRC press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b19467.

Knack, S. and Zak, P. J. (2003). Building trust: public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development. Supreme court economic review, 10:91–107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/scer.10.1147139.

Koufaris, M. and Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Information & management, 41(3):377–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.004.

Kunthi, R., Wahyuni, R., Al-Hafidz, M. U., and Sensuse, D. I. (2018). Exploring antecedent factors toward knowledge sharing intention in e-learning. In 2018 IEEE Symposium on Computer Applications & Industrial Electronics (ISCAIE), pages 108–113. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCAIE.2018.8405453.

Kutsyuruba, B. and Walker, K. (2015). The lifecycle of trust in educational leadership: An ecological perspective. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1):106–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2014.915061.

Laifa, M., Giglou, R. I., Akhrouf, S., and Maamri, R. (2015). Trust and forgiveness in virtual teams: A study in algerian e-learning context. In 2015 International Conference on Interactive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning (IMCL), pages 131–135. IEEE. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IMCTL.2015.7359571.

Li, Y., Bao, H., Zheng, Y., and Huang, Z. (2015). Social analytics framework to boost recommendation in online learning communities. In 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pages 405–406. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2015.100.

Lima, M. and Maciel, R. (2021). Practices and digital technological resources for remote education: an investigation of brazilian professor’s profile. In Proceedings of the 32nd Brazilian Symposium on Informatics in Education, pages 225–236, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC. DOI: 10.5753/sbie.2021.218676.

Lohikoski, P., Muhos, M., and Härkönen, J. (2014). Virtual collaboration competence requirements for entrepreneurship education in sparsely populated areas. In ICEL-2014 Hosted by The Federico Santa María Technical University Valparaiso Chile, pages 109–117. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Mahamud, S., Fam, S.-F., Saleh, H., Kamarudin, M. F., and Wahjono, S. I. (2021). Predicting google classroom acceptance and use in stem education: Extended utaut2 approach. In 2021 2nd SEA-STEM International Conference (SEA-STEM), pages 155–159. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SEA-STEM53614.2021.9668096.

Mao, Y. and Shen, H. (2016). Web of credit: Adaptive personalized trust network inference from online rating data. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 3(4):176–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2016.2639016.

Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., and Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review, 20(3):709–734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.

Mayfield, C. O. and Valenti, A. (2022). Team satisfaction, identity, and trust: a comparison of face-to-face and virtual student teams. Active Learning in Higher Education, pages 213–226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221118861.

McEvily, B., Zaheer, A., and Soda, G. (2021). Network trust. In Understanding trust in organizations, pages 179–204. Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429449185.

Medema, W., Wals, A., and Adamowski, J. (2014). Multi-loop social learning for sustainable land and water governance: Towards a research agenda on the potential of virtual learning platforms. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 69:23–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2014.03.003.

Miguel, J., Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., and Prieto, J. (2014a). Security in online learning assessment towards an effective trustworthiness approach to support e-learning teams. In 2014 IEEE 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, pages 123–130. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2014.106.

Miguel, J., Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., Prieto, J., and Barolli, L. (2014b). A collective intelligence approach for building student’s trustworthiness profile in online learning. In 2014 Ninth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing, pages 46–53. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2014.132.

Miguel, J., Caballé, S., Xhafa, F., Prieto, J., and Barolli, L. (2014c). Predicting trustworthiness behavior to enhance security in on-line assessment. In 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, pages 342–349. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2014.19.

Morrison, R., Cegielski, C. G., and Rainer, R. K. (2012). Trust, avatars, and electronic communications: Implications for e-learning. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 53(1):80–89. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Napoleão, B. M., Felizardo, K. R., de Souza, É. F., Petrillo, F., Hallé, S., Vijaykumar, N. L., and Nakagawa, E. Y. (2021). Establishing a search string to detect secondary studies in software engineering. In 2021 47th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA), pages 9–16. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA53835.2021.00010.

Nigam, A., Pasricha, R., Singh, T., and Churi, P. (2021). A systematic review on ai-based proctoring systems: Past, present and future. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5):6421–6445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10597-x.

Noh, J., Jang, H., and Jeon, S. (2021). The influence of e-wom information characteristics on learning trust and e-wom intention among online learning. pages 258–272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33168/LISS.2021.0208.

Petersen, K., Vakkalanka, S., and Kuzniarz, L. (2015). Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update. Information and software technology, 64:1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007.

Pham, C., Vu, N., and Tran, G. (2020). The role of e-learning service quality and e-trust on e-loyalty. Management Science Letters, 10(12):2741–2750. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.4.036.

Procaci, T. B., Siqueira, S. W. M., and de Andrade, L. C. V. (2014). Encontrando usuários confiáveis em comunidades online de perguntas e respostas através de seu Índice de confiança. In Anais do X Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação, pages 675–686, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2014.6155.

Pulgar, J., Ramírez, D., Umanzor, A., Candia, C., and Sánchez, I. (2022). Long-term collaboration with strong friendship ties improves academic performance in remote and hybrid teaching modalities in high school physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 18:010146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010146.

Rehman, A., Ahmed, A., Alahmadi, T. J., Mirdad, A. R., Al Ghofaily, B., and Saleem, K. (2024). A framework for generating recommendations based on trust in an informal e-learning environment. PeerJ Computer Science, 10. Cited by: 1; All Open Access, Gold Open Access. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2386.

Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative science quarterly, pages 574–599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393868.

Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of personality, pages 651–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x.

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., and Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3):393–404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.

Schaubroeck, J. M., Peng, A. C., and Hannah, S. T. (2013). Developing trust with peers and leaders: Impacts on organizational identification and performance during entry. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4):1148–1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0358.

Sedighehm, M. and Ainin, S. (2018). Effect of trust and perceived reciprocal benefit on students knowledge sharing via fb and academic performance. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(1):23–35. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Snyman, A. M. (2021). A framework for staff retention in the higher education environment: effects of the psychological contract, organisational justice and trust. PhD thesis. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Surahman, E. and Wang, T.-H. (2022). Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: a systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6):1535–1553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12708.

Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267102221136.

Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., and Biemans, H. J. (2022). The effects of students’ perceived usefulness and trustworthiness of peer feedback on learning satisfaction in online learning environments. pages 263–271. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd22.2022.14445.

Tan, W., Li, J., Tang, A., Wang, T., and Hu, X. (2012). Trust evaluation model based on user trust cloud and user capability in e-learning service. In Zhao, M. and Sha, J., editors, Communications and Information Processing, pages 583–590, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Trainer, E. H. and Redmiles, D. F. (2018). Bridging the gap between awareness and trust in globally distributed software teams. Journal of Systems and Software, 144:328–341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.028.

Tsankova, R., Marinov, O., Durcheva, M., and Varbanova, E. (2017). Synergy effect of the tesla project in management of engineering higher education. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems, pages 259–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3167020.3167059.

Tseng, H., Yeh, H.-T., and Tang, Y. (2019). A close look at trust among team members in online learning communities. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(1):52–65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2019010104.

Udhayakumar, S., Uma Nandhini, D., and Chandrasekaran, S. (2021). Trusted cooperative e-learning service deployment model in multi-cloud environment. In Ranganathan, G., Chen, J., and Rocha, Á., editors, Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies, pages 527–535, Singapore. Springer Singapore.

Valtolina, S., Matamoros, R. A., Musiu, E., Epifania, F., and Villa, M. (2022). Extended utaut model to analyze the acceptance of virtual assistant’s recommendations using interactive visualisations. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3531129.

Van Solingen, R., Basili, V., Caldiera, G., and Rombach, H. D. (2002). Goal question metric (gqm) approach. Encyclopedia of software engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471028959.sof142.

Wang, M.-j. and Chen, H. C. (2012). Emotions and pair trust in asynchronous hospitality cultural exchange for students in taiwan and hong kong. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(4):119 –– 131. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Wang, Y. D. (2014). Building student trust in online learning environments. Distance Education, 35(3):345–359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955267.

Wang, Y. D. and Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in human behavior, 21(1):105–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008.

Widjaja, A. E., Chen, J. V., and Hiele, T. M. (2016). The effect of online participation in online learning course for studying trust in information and communication technologies. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 6(3):79–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCBPL.2016070106.

Widjaja, H. A. E., Santoso, S. W., Fernando, E., Condrobimo, A. R., et al. (2020). Improving the quality of learning management system (lms) based on student perspectives using utaut2 and trust model. In 2020 4th International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS), pages 1–6. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICoS51170.2020.9298985.

Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., and Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in software engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-69306-3.

Wongse-ek, W., Wills, G. B., and Gilbert, L. (2013). Towards a trust model in e-learning: Antecedents of a student’s trust. International Association for Development of the Information Society. [link][Access on 22 August 2025].

Wu, B. and Zhang, C. (2015). Trust evaluation for inter-organization knowledge sharing via the e-learning community. The Electronic Library, 33(3):400–416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2013-0140.

Younas, A., Faisal, C. N., Habib, M. A., Ashraf, R., and Ahmad, M. (2021). Role of design attributes to determine the intention to use online learning via cognitive beliefs. Ieee Access, 9:94181–94202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093348.

Zhang, X., Li, M., Seng, D., Chen, X., and Chen, X. (2022). A novel precise personalized learning recommendation model regularized with trust and influence. Scientific Programming, 2022:1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8479423.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

BARBOSA, M. P.; MACIEL, R. S. P. Interpersonal Trust Among Students in Virtual Learning Environments: A Comprehensive Review. Journal on Interactive Systems, Porto Alegre, RS, v. 16, n. 1, p. 687–717, 2025. DOI: 10.5753/jis.2025.6118. Disponível em: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/jis/article/view/6118. Acesso em: 19 dec. 2025.

Issue

Section

Regular Paper