Work HCI Data: What it Is, Who it Belongs to, and the Need for Regulation

Luis Gonçalves; Roseli Figaro

doi:10.5753/jis.2026.7939

Authors

Luis Gonçalves University of São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4226-4189
Roseli Figaro University of São Paulo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9710-904X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2026.7939

Keywords:

Datafication, Sensitive Materialities, Work HCI Data, Media

Abstract

Both the LGPD (General Data Protection Law) and the data protection bills currently pending in the National Congress do not prescribe sufficient guidelines on the use of human-computer interaction (HCI) data from work, whether for monitoring working hours or for application toward other purposes, which allows corporate interests and collective damages to remain inadequately characterized. This article seeks to contribute to filling this gap by discussing the production of workplace HCI through computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) software and the challenges in implementing public policies that protect workers’ know-how. To this end, we start from the empirical focus of the work of media (which includes a datafication experiment), in addition to reviewing parts of the academic literature on the subject and the corporate documentation of socio-digital platforms (terms of use, privacy policies, financial statements, patents, etc.), especially Google, Meta and Alphabet. The theoretical deepening regarding what the data is, its quality, and the purpose of its capture helps clarify the economic functioning of the digital data productive chain [Lastres et al., 2025], and reveals the specificities of non-personal data—above all, data from work processes. The results presented in the analyses aim to support public policies to regulate how companies should proceed when appropriating workplace HCI.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., Makhdoumi, A., Malekian, A., and Ozdaglar, A. (2022). Too much data: Prices and inefficiencies in data markets. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 14(4):218–256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20200200.

Agre, P. E. (1994). Surveillance and capture: Two models of privacy. The Information Society, 10(2):101–127.

AIPOWW Global Tracker (Brasil) (2025). Essex AI policy observatory for the world of work. University of Essex. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Amorim, H., Cardoso, A. C. M., and Bridi, M. A. (2022). Capitalismo industrial de plataforma: Externalizações, sínteses e resistências. Caderno CRH, 35:e022021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.49956.

Arrieta-Ibarra, I., Goff, L., Jiménez-Hernández, D., Lanier, J., and Weyl, E. G. (2018). Should we treat data as labor? moving beyond “free”. In AEA Papers and Proceedings, volume 108, pages 38–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181003.

Auerbach, D. B., Khan, O. H., and Lawrence, S. R. (2017). Systems and methods for selectively storing event data. U.S. Patent US9672232B1. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Banco Central do Brasil (n.d.). Drex. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Battle, A. J., Cohn, D. A., Grimes, C. E., and Lamping, J. O. (2019). Deriving and using interaction profiles. U.S. Patent US10387512B2. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Bednarz, Z., Lewis, K., and Sadowski, J. (2025). ‘it’s not personal, it’s strictly business’: Behavioural insurance and the impacts of non-personal data on individuals, groups and societies. Computer Law & Security Review, 56:106096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106096.

Blunden, A. (2010). An Interdisciplinary Theory of Activity. Brill.

Bose, A. and Landa, E. (2014). System and method for generating business process models from mapped time sequenced operational and transaction data. U.S. Patent 8,688,499. [link]. Accessed on September 21, 2026.

Brasil (2018). Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. lei geral de proteção de dados pessoais (lgpd). Presidência da República. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Coleti, T. A., Divino, S. B. S., Salgado, A. d. L., Zacarias, R. O., Saraiva, J. d. A. G., Gonçalves, D. A., Morandini, M., and Santos, R. P. d. (2024). Grandhci-br 2025–2035 – gc5: Interação humano-dados, alfabetização de dados e privacidade acessível. In Anais do XXIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3702038.3702058.

Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (CGI.br) (2023). Sistematização das contribuições à consulta sobre regulação de plataformas digitais. Technical report, NIC.br|CGI.br. [link]. Accessed on September 21, 2026.

Costa, G. C. d., Rebechi, C. N., Gonçalves, L. H. N., Raslan Filho, G. S., Boava, A. Z., and Valente, V. C. P. N. (2025). A política de privacidade da plataforma x em análise. Lumina, 19(1):10–29. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Cukier, K. and Mayer-Schoenberger, V. (2013). The rise of big data: How it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs, 92(3):28–40.

de Santana, V. F., Ferreira, J. J., de Paula, R. A., and de Gusmão Cerqueira, R. F. (2018). An eye gaze model for seismic interpretation support. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, ETRA ’18, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3204493.3204554.

Dias, T. (2023). Big techs abraçaram bolsonarismo em ofensiva contra pl das fake news. Intercept Brasil. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Ding, Z. and Zivkovic, D. (2017). Client-side click tracking. U.S. Patent US9608892B2. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Dinkowski, T. G., Avila, D. T., and Thom, L. H. (2025). Fifteen years of process mining in brazil: Current contributions, most used techniques, and challenges. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (SBSI), pages 409–418. SBC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbsi.2025.246519.

Ekbia, H. R. and Nardi, B. A. (2017). Heteromation, and other stories of computing and capitalism. MIT Press.

Figaro, R. (2018). As relações de comunicação e as condições de produção no trabalho de jornalistas em arranjos econômicos alternativos às corporações de mídia. ECAUSP; Centro de Pesquisa em Comunicação e Trabalho. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Figaro, R. (2021). Discurso jornalístico e condições de produção em arranjos econômicos alternativos às corporações de mídia. ECA-USP; Centro de Pesquisa em Comunicação e Trabalho. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Figaro, R. (2024). Datificação das materialidades sensíveis: captura das atividades cotidianas de trabalhadores da comunicação. Chasqui: Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (157). DOI: https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v1i157.5039.

Figaro, R. et al. (2026). Trabalho jornalístico, plataformas digitais e captura de dados: os limites da independência nos arranjos alternativos. In Anais do 35º Encontro Anual da COMPÓS, volume 35. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Gerber, C. (2019). Old power in digital garb. In Butollo, F. and Nuss, S., editors, Marx and the robots: Networked production, AI and human labour, pages 199–214. Pluto Books.

Giermindl, L. M., Strich, F., Christ, O., Leicht-Deobald, U., and Redzepi, A. (2022). The dark sides of people analytics: Reviewing the perils for organisations and employees. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3):410–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927213.

Gonçalves, L. H. N. (2023). Máquinas Automágicas: trabalho, mente estendida e subjetividade sob o fetiche da mercadoria. Tese de doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Google (2023). Cloud data processing addendum. Google LLC. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Google (2024). Termos de serviço do Google. Google LLC. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Google (n.d.). Measurement protocol para o Google Analytics 4. Google Developers. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Grudin, J. (2002). Computer-supported cooperative work: History and focus. Computer, 27(5):19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/2.291294.

Harper, R. and Randall, D. (2024). Machine learning and the work of the user. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 33:103–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-023-09483-6.

Hess, D., Schot, A.-J., and Van Der Schyff, T. (2023). Getting Started with Microsoft Viva: An End User Guide to Business Transformation. Apress.

Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481.

Kuscher, A. F., Messerly, K. J., and Chen, J. S.-M. (2018). Integrated task items launcher user interface for selecting and presenting a subset of task items based on user activity information. U.S. Patent US9952882B2. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Kuutti, K. (1991). The concept of activity as a basic unit of analysis for CSCW research. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW’91), pages 249–264. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3506-1_19.

Lastres, H. M. M., Cassiolato, J. E., and Dantas, M. (2025). Economia política de dados e soberania digital: Conceitos, desafios e experiências no mundo. Editora Contracorrente.

Lawrence, S. R. and Wang, N. (2014). Systems and methods for determining an article association measure. U.S. Patent US8667013B1. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.

Lermen, S., Paleka, D., Swanson, J., Aerni, M., Carlini, N., and Tramèr, F. (2026). Desanonimização online em larga escala com llms. In 35º Simpósio de Segurança da USENIX (USENIX Security 26), pages 1947–1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.16800.

Menabrea, L. F. (1842). Sketch of the analytical engine invented by Charles Babbage. Translated by Ada Lovelace. Original work published 1842. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Milvaney, D. L. et al. (2024). Document status management system. European Patent EP3803737B1. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Norman, D. A. (2008). O design do dia a dia. Rocco.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Broadway Books.

Pasquinelli, M. (2023). The eye of the master: A social history of artificial intelligence. Verso Books.

Perry, M. K. (1978). Vertical integration: The monopsony case. American Economic Review, 68(4):561–570. [link]. Accessed on September 21, 2026.

Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. (2000). Knowledge discovery in databases: 10 years after. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 1(2):59–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/846183.846197.

Posner, E. and Weyl, E. G. (2018). Radical markets: Uprooting capitalism and democracy for a just society. Princeton University Press.

Russell, S. J. and Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson, 4th edition.

Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549.

Schwartz, Y. (2011). Conceituando o trabalho, o visível e o invisível. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 9:19–45.

Schwartz, Y. (2014). Motivações do conceito de corpo-si: Corpo-si, atividade, experiência. Letras de hoje, 49(3):259–274.

Schwartz, Y. (2019). O enigma do corpo no trabalho. Ergologia, 22.

Smith, A. (2023). A riqueza das nações. Nova Fronteira.

Soegaard, M. and Dam, R. F. (2012). The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. The Encyclopedia of HumanComputer Interaction.

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.

Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers, New York.

Trant, J. (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10(1). [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

van der Aalst, W., Adriansyah, A., de Medeiros, A. K. A., Arcieri, F., and Baier, T. (2012). Process mining manifesto. In Business Process Management Workshops, pages 169–194, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_19.

Viana Braz, M. (2021). Heteromação e microtrabalho no brasil. Sociologias, 23(57):134–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-111017.

Viljoen, S. (2021). A relational theory of data governance. Yale Law Journal, 131:573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3727562.

Wong, W. H., Duncan, J., and Lake, D. A. (2025). Why data about people are so hard to govern. Regulation & Governance, 19(1):236–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12591.

Wu, X., Wu, E., and Klebanov, M. A. (2024). Dynamically configurable client application activity. U.S. Patent US12160481B2. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Zhang, F., Zhuang, P., and Meng, Y. (2018). Optimize UI data cached for future actions. Chinese Patent CN108605053A. [link]. Accessed on September 3, 2026.

Zuboff, S. (2021). A era do capitalismo de vigilância. Editora Intrínseca.