Weigh and Expand: Impact and Limitations of Contextual Sparse Representations in Topic Modeling

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/reic.2026.8472

Keywords:

Topic Modeling, Contextual Sparse Representations, Term Weighting, Term Expansion

Abstract

This work investigates the use of strategies based on contextual-sparse representations for the task of Topic Modeling (TM), aiming to reconcile the interpretability of sparse representations with the semantic richness provided by context. To this end, we employ the SPLADE model, which represents documents in a context-sensitive manner through mechanisms of term expansion and weighting. The approach is empirically evaluated in comparison with other forms of representation, using a traditional metric and considering distinct datasets. The results show that the weighting stage supports effective TM, whereas expansion, although promising, still presents limitations arising from the incompatibility between the representation vocabulary and the original texts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelrazek, A., Eid, Y., Gawish, E., Medhat, W., and Hassan, A. (2023). Topic modeling algorithms and applications: A survey. Information Systems, 112:102131.

Arora, S., May, A., Zhang, J., and Ré, C. (2020). Contextual embeddings: When are they worth it? arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.09117.

Bianchi, F., Terragni, S., and Hovy, D. (2021). Pre-training is a hot topic: Contextualized document embeddings improve topic coherence. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 759–766.

Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., and Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan):993–1022.

Bouma, G. (2009). Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. Proceedings of GSCL.

Boutsidis, C. and Gallopoulos, E. (2008). Svd based initialization: A head start for nonnegative matrix factorization. Pattern Recognition, 41(4):1350–1362. DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2007.09.010.

Churchill, R. and Singh, L. (2022). The evolution of topic modeling. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(10s).

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. (2019). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American ACL: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and short papers), pages 4171–4186.

Doogan, C. and Buntine, W. (2021). Topic model or topic twaddle? re-evaluating demantic interpretability measures. In North American Association for Computational Linguistics 2021, pages 3824–3848. ACL.

Formal, T., Lassance, C., Piwowarski, B., and Clinchant, S. (2022). From distillation to hard negative sampling: Making sparse neural ir models more effective. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, page 2353–2359.

Gao, X., Lin, Y., Li, R., Wang, Y., Chu, X., Ma, X., and Yu, H. (2024). Enhancing topic interpretability for neural topic modeling through topic-wise contrastive learning. In 2024 IEEE 40th ICDE.

Ghahramani, Z. and Attias, H. (2000). Online variational bayesian learning. In Slides from talk presented at NIPS workshop on Online Learning.

Grootendorst, M. (2022). Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794.

Júnior, A. P. D. S., Cecilio, P., Viegas, F., Cunha, W., Albergaria, E. T. D., and Rocha, L. C. D. D. (2022). Evaluating topic modeling pre-processing pipelines for portuguese texts. WebMedia ’22, page 191–201. DOI: 10.1145/3539637.3557052.

Kuang, D., Choo, J., and Park, H. (2015). Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Interactive Topic Modeling and Document Clustering, pages 215–243. Springer International Publishing, Cham.

Lee, D. D. and Seung, H. S. (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. nature, 401(6755):788–791.

Liang, P., Bommasani, R., Lee, T., Tsipras, D., Soylu, D., Yasunaga, M., Zhang, Y., Narayanan, D., Wu, Y., Kumar, A., et al. (2022). Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.09110.

Machado, A. C., França, C., Nunes, I., Gonçalves, M. A., and Rocha, L. (2025). Pondere e expanda: Impacto e limitações de representações contextual-esparsas na modelagem de tópicos. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Banco de Dados (SBBD), pages 928–934. SBC.

Viegas, F., Canuto, S., Gomes, C., Luiz, W., Rosa, T., Ribas, S., Rocha, L., and Gonçalves, M. A. (2019). Cluwords: exploiting semantic word clustering representation for enhanced topic modeling. In Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 753–761.

Viegas, F., Cunha, W., Gomes, C., Pereira, A., Rocha, L., and Goncalves, M. (2020). CluHTM - semantic hierarchical topic modeling based on CluWords. In Jurafsky, D., Chai, J., Schluter, N., and Tetreault, J., editors, Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8138–8150.

Viegas, F., Pereira, A., Cunha, W., França, C., Andrade, C., Tuler, E., Rocha, L., and Gonçalves, M. A. (2025). Exploiting contextual embeddings in hierarchical topic modeling and investigating the limits of the current evaluation metrics. Computational Linguistics, pages 1–41. DOI: 10.1162/coli_a_00543.

Published

2026-07-10

How to Cite

Machado, A. C., França, C., Gonçalves, M. A., & Rocha, L. (2026). Weigh and Expand: Impact and Limitations of Contextual Sparse Representations in Topic Modeling. Electronic Journal of Undergraduate Research on Computing, 24(1), 445–451. https://doi.org/10.5753/reic.2026.8472

Issue

Section

Full Papers