Understanding Brainstorming in the Creative Process of Game Design: Tools, Challenges, and Perspectives from Industry Professionals

Diego Angellus Duarte D’Andrea; Tadeu Moreira de Classe; Sean Wolfgand Matsui Siqueira

doi:10.5753/jis.2026.8057

Authors

Diego Angellus Duarte D’Andrea Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6115-1253
Tadeu Moreira de Classe Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9849-5133
Sean Wolfgand Matsui Siqueira Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0864-2396

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2026.8057

Keywords:

Game Design, Brainstorm, Psychology, Neuroscience, Creative Process, Industry Professionals

Abstract

Brainstorming is a fundamental stage in game development, supporting the generation of ideas and the early articulation of design decisions. However, designers may face difficulties in selecting appropriate tools and in integrating player-centered concerns, such as motivation and emotion, into ideation in a structured way. This study investigates the tools and methods used during brainstorming sessions in game design, focusing on practitioners' preferences, challenges, and perceptions regarding psychological aspects in concept formation. An exploratory questionnaire-based study was conducted with participants involved in game development and prior brainstorming experience. The results indicate the use of diverse supports, including organizational platforms, visual collaboration tools, analog resources, and prototyping practices. They also suggest that, although participants recognize the importance of motivation, emotion, and player behavior, these dimensions are not yet consistently incorporated into brainstorming through structured methods or tools. The study offers an empirical overview of current brainstorming practices and points to opportunities for more structured and player-centered ideation supports.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Routledge.

Anderson, B. R., Shah, J. H., and Kreminski, M. (2024). Homogenization effects of large language models on human creative ideation. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pages 413–425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3635636.3656204.

Baharom, S. N., Tan, W. H., Idris, M. Z., et al. (2014). Emotional design for games: A framework for player-centric approach in the game design process. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 9(10):387–398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2014.9.10.37.

Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., and Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42(7):1186–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8.

Beaty, R. L., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., and Schacter, D. L. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports, 5(1):10964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10964.

Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2):77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA.

Brown, T. (2009). Change by Design: How Design Thinking Creates New Alternatives for Business and Society. Collins Business.

Callele, D., Neufeld, E., and Schneider, K. (2009). Visualizing emotional requirements. In 2009 Fourth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering Visualization, pages 1–10. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2009.7.

Carneiro, N., Miranda, D., Pereira, G., Mendonça, G., and Darin, T. (2022). A systematic mapping on player's profiles: motivations, behavior, and personality characteristics. Journal on Interactive Systems, 13(1):257–273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/jis.2022.2572.

Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1):7–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7.

Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE, 5 edition.

Croissant, M., Schofield, G., and McCall, C. (2023). Emotion design for video games: A framework for affective interactivity. ACM Games: Research and Practice, 1(3):1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3624537.

Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Flow (edição revista e atualizada): A psicologia do alto desempenho e da felicidade. Objetiva.

Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, rationality and the human brain, volume 352. New York: Putnam.

D'Andrea, D. A. D., Classe, T. M., and Siqueira, S. W. M. (2025a). Mapeamento sistemático da literatura sobre frameworks de game design baseados em motivação e emoção. In Anais do XXIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pages 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbgames.2025.9655.

Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11:1011–1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196731.

Dorst, K. (2006). Design problems and design paradoxes. Design Issues, 22(3):4–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2006.22.3.4.

D'Andrea, D. A. D., Classe, T. M., and Siqueira, S. W. M. (2025b). O papel das ferramentas de brainstorming e psicologia no processo criativo do game design: Survey com profissionais da indústria de jogos. In Anais do XXIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pages 1978–1989, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. SBC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbgames.2025.9674.

Ekman, P., Dalgleish, T., and Power, M. (1999). Basic emotions. John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, USA.

Fullerton, T. (2014). Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. CRC Press.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

Ho, X. and Tomitsch, M. (2019). Affordances of brainstorming toolkits and their use in game jams. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3337722.3341841.

Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., and Zubek, R. (2004). Mda: A formal approach to game design and game research. AAAI Technical Report WS-04-04, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA.

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.

Inie, N. and Dalsgaard, P. (2020). How interaction designers use tools to manage ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 27(2):1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3365104.

Isbister, K. (2016). How Games Move Us: Emotion by Design. MIT Press.

Maslow, A. H. and Murphy, G. (1954). Motivation and Personality. (Under the Editorship of Gardner Murphy.). Harper & Bros.

Norman, D. A. (2008). Design emocional: por que adoramos (ou detestamos) os objetos do dia-a-dia. Rocco.

Oliveira, A. L. d., Vieira, C. C., and Amaral, M. A. (2021). O questionário online na investigação em educação: reflexões epistemológicas, metodológicas e éticas. Portas que o Digital abriu na Investigação em Educação, pages 30–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34627/uab.edel.15.3.

Oliveira, E. G., Classe, T. M., and de Castro, R. M. (2023). Casej: Game design canvas para brainstorming de jogos para saúde. In Anais Estendidos do XXII Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pages 1223–1234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/sbgames_estendido.2023.233288.

Paulus, P. B. and Nijstad, B. A. (2019). Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration. Oxford University Press.

Peters, D., Loke, L., and Ahmadpour, N. (2021). Toolkits, cards and games – a review of analogue tools for collaborative ideation. CoDesign, 17(4):410–434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2020.1715444.

Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In Theories of Emotion, pages 3–33. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50007-7.

Possamai, D. S., Hounsell, M. d. S., and Gasparini, I. (2021). The abcde methodology: Emphasizing creativity in the design of serious games. iSys - Brazilian Journal of Information Systems, 14(1):24–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5753/isys.2021.993.

Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., and Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2):154–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440.

Ricchiuti, D. (2022). Game Design Tools: Cognitive, Psychological, and Practical Approaches. CRC Press.

Runco, M. A. and Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1):92–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092.

Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., and Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4):344–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8.

Salen, K. (2007). Game design. In Carlisle, R. P., editor, Encyclopedia of Play in Today's Society. SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8140-0_119.

Schell, J. (2019). The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. AK Peters/CRC Press.

Siriaraya, P., Visch, V., Vermeeren, A., and Bas, M. (2018). A cookbook method for persuasive game design. International Journal of Serious Games, 5(1):37–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v5i1.159.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2):257–285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7.

Trivisios, A. N. (1987). Introdução à pesquisa em ciências sociais, volume 133. A pesquisa.

Wit, J. (2021). A unified model of game design, through the lens of user experience. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451778.

Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6):772–775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.772.

Yee, N. (2016). The gamer motivation profile: Model and findings Game Developers Conference. URL: [link], Access on 8 August 2026.