The Use of Learning Analytics in Online Learning Environments: a Systematic Literature Mapping

Authors

  • Michael Miller Rodrigues Cardoso Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • João Victor Falcão Santos Lima Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Márcio Henrique Vieira de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Alagoas
  • Ranilson Oscar Araujo Paiva Universidade Federal de Alagoas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2022.2664

Keywords:

Learning Analytics, Online Learning Environments, Data Visualization, Prediction of Students at Risk, Online education, Systematic Literature Mapping

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a great increase in the number of researches and application possibilities for an area of ​​Learning Analytics, with regard to the measurement, collection, analysis and communication of data from students and their contexts in education. This study assesses the current state of the field of learning analytics through the analysis of scientific articles that address its use in online learning educational environments. Following a planning/protocol and conducting with the help of the Sumarize platform, a systematic mapping was carried out that resulted in 38 final studies that focus on the objective of understanding how Learning Analytics is used to help identify students who are facing difficulties in online courses. The studies were analyzed in detail based on the main objective mentioned above and the other defined research objectives. The results provided an overview of the area of Learning Analytics and the different problems that can be solved through its use, highlighting the identification of students with difficulties, in an attempt to solve the problem of failure and dropout in distance learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akçapınar, G., Hasnine, M. N., Majumdar, R., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2019). Developing an early-warning system for spotting at-risk students by using eBook interaction logs. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 4. doi: 10.1186/s40561-019-0083-4 [GS Search]

Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2020). Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: A cause and effect decision‐making model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), 429-454. doi: 10.1007/s12528-019-09241-y [GS Search]

Avella, J. T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S. G., & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(2), 13-29. doi: 10.24059/olj.v20i2.790 [GS Search]

Bhatti, M. I., Awan, H. M., & Razaq, Z. (2014). The key performance indicators (KPIs) and their impact on overall organizational performance. Quality & Quantity, 48(6), 3127-3143. doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9945-y [GS Search]

BR, Censo Ead. (2019). Relatório analítico da aprendizagem a distância no Brasil. url: [Link]

Clow, D. (2012, April). The learning analytics cycle: closing the loop effectively. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 134-138). doi: 10.1145/2330601.2330636 [GS Search]

Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Joksimovic, S. (2014, March). Current state and future trends: A citation network analysis of the learning analytics field. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 231-240). doi: 10.1145/2567574.2567585 [GS Search]

Dermeval, D., Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Vassileva, J., & Borges, D. (2018). Authoring tools for designing intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 336-384. doi: 10.1007/s40593-017-0157-9 [GS Search]

Filvà, D. A., Forment, M. A., García-Peñalvo, F. J., Escudero, D. F., & Casañ, M. J. (2019). Clickstream for learning analytics to assess students’ behavior with Scratch. Future Generation Computer Systems, 93, 673-686. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2018.10.057 [GS Search]

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gasevic, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68-84. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002 [GS Search]

Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64-71. doi: 10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x [GS Search]

Hernández-García, Á., González-González, I., Jiménez-Zarco, A. I., & Chaparro-Peláez, J. (2015). Applying social learning analytics to message boards in online distance learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 68-80. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.038 [GS Search]

Hlosta, M., Zdrahal, Z., & Zendulka, J. (2017, March). Ouroboros: early identification of at-risk students without models based on legacy data. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 6-15). doi: 10.1145/3027385.3027449 [GS Search]

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report. url: [Link] [GS Search]

Moissa, Barbara & Gasparini, Isabela & Kemczinski, Avanilde. (2015). A Systematic Mapping on the Learning Analytics Field and Its Analysis in the Massive Open Online Courses Context. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 13. 1-24. doi: 10.4018/IJDET.2015070101 [GS Search]

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008, June). Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE) 12 (pp. 1-10). doi: 10.14236/ewic/EASE2008.8 [GS Search]

Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., Stoyanov, S., & Specht, M. (2014). Quality indicators for learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 117-132. url: [Link] [GS Search]

Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. D. (2012, April). Learning analytics and educational data mining: towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 252-254). doi: 10.1145/2330601.2330661 [GS Search]

Siemens, G. (2013). Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1380-1400. doi: 10.1177/0002764213498851 [GS Search]

Tseng, S. F., Tsao, Y. W., Yu, L. C., Chan, C. L., & Lai, K. R. (2016). Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(1), 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s41039-016-0033-5 [GS Search]

van Leeuwen, A., Rummel, N., & Van Gog, T. (2019). What information should CSCL teacher dashboards provide to help teachers interpret CSCL situations?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(3), 261-289. doi: 10.1007/s11412-019-09299-x [GS Search]

Xing, W., Chen, X., Stein, J., & Marcinkowski, M. (2016). Temporal predication of dropouts in MOOCs: Reaching the low hanging fruit through stacking generalization. Computers in human behavior, 58, 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.007 [GS Search]

You, J. W. (2016). Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.11.003 [GS Search]

Zacharis, N. Z. (2015). A multivariate approach to predicting student outcomes in web-enabled blended learning courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.05.002 [GS Search]

Published

2022-09-27

How to Cite

CARDOSO, M. M. R.; LIMA, J. V. F. S.; OLIVEIRA, M. H. V. de; PAIVA, R. O. A. The Use of Learning Analytics in Online Learning Environments: a Systematic Literature Mapping. Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education, [S. l.], v. 30, p. 396–418, 2022. DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2022.2664. Disponível em: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/2664. Acesso em: 4 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles