Automatic content adaptation in interactive environment for individualized learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2023.2906

Keywords:

Intelligent tutoring systems, Learning Styles, Natural Language Processing, Content Adaptation, Learning

Abstract

Intelligent tutoring systems have been highlighted as a tool for learning support, mainly because its adaptation to user’s condition and application scenario.
In the face of this pandemic situation, learning supporting tools, as tutoring systems, because of their viability for application in remote environment, showed as an alternative for professors and students support. This paper addresses a proposal for content adaptation to learning, applying artificial intelligence techniques to text Generation and natural language processing. Furthermore, this paper considered existence for different learning styles, varying according to student personality and his way to collect information, capable to influence in learning level. This style variation, accordingly to a model defined in literature, directs content adaptation model to be done, generating an adapted result to each learning style.
Personalized content generation process allows an advance in way to use tutoring systems in learning, creating a format for directed content delivery with gains for environment’s user, generating a personalized results and conducting to a more effective learning. As a result, expect to obtain a methodology to content generation based on pre-defined learning styles, by mean an automatized process to content adaptation from an initial entry in unique format.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cassidy*, S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and measures. Educational psychology, 24(4), 419–444. [GS Search]

Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 849–874). Elsevier. [GS Search]

Furtado, M. D., Schwengber, H. T., da Rosa, W. L. d. O., & da Silva, A. F. (2021). Um guia para ensino remoto: do conceito às dicas técnicas. SCIAS-Educação, Comunicação e Tecnologia, 3(2), 6–27. [GS Search]

Hämäläinen, W., & Vinni, M. (2006). Comparison of machine learning methods for intelligent tutoring systems. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 525-534). [GS Search]

Idkhan, A. M., & Idris, M. M. (2021). Dimensions of students learning styles at the university with the kolb learning model. International Journal of Environment, Engineering & Education, 3(2), 75–82. [GS Search]

James, W. B., & Gardner, D. L. (1995). Learning styles: Implications for distance learning. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1995(67), 19–31. [GS Search]

Khodeir, N., Wanas, N., Darwish, N., & Hegazy, N. (2014). Bayesian based adaptive question generation technique. Journal of Electrical Systems and Information Technology, 1(1), 10–16. [GS Search]

Kolb, D. A. (1976). Management and the learning process. California management review, 18(3), 21–31. [GS Search]

Kolb, D. A. (2007). The kolb learning style inventory. Hay Resources Direct Boston, MA. [GS Search]

Kozierkiewicz-Hetmanska, A. (2011). A method for scenario recommendation in intelligent e- ´ learning systems. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 42(2), 82–99. [GS Search]

Meenakshi, K., Sunder, R., Kumar, A., & Sharma, N. (2017). An intelligent smart tutor system based on emotion analysis and recommendation engine. In 2017 international conference on iot and application (iciot) (pp. 1–4). [GS Search]

Rondini, C. A., Pedro, K. M., dos Santos Duarte, C., et al. (2020). Pandemia do covid-19 e o ensino remoto emergencial: mudanças na práxis docente. Educação, 10(1), 41–57. [GS Search]

Shah, R., Shah, D., & Kurup, L. (2017). Automatic question generation for intelligent tutoring systems. In 2017 2nd international conference on communication systems, computing and it applications (cscita) (pp. 127–132). [GS Search]

Singhal, R., Goyal, S., & Henz, M. (2016). User-defined difficulty levels for automated question generation. In 2016 ieee 28th international conference on tools with artificial intelligence (ictai) (pp. 828–835). [GS Search]

Tiam-Lee, T. J., & Sumi, K. (2018). Procedural generation of programming exercises with guides based on the student’s emotion. In 2018 ieee international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (smc) (pp. 1465–1470). [GS Search]

Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Virvou, M. (2019). Adaptive e-learning interactions using dynamic clustering of learners’ characteristics. In 2019 10th international conference on information, intelligence, systems and applications (iisa) (pp. 1–7). [GS Search]

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. [GS Search]

Zhiping, L., Yu, S., & Tianwei, X. (2011). A formal model of personalized recommendation systems in intelligent tutoring systems. In 2011 6th international conference on computer science & education (iccse) (pp. 1006–1009). [GS Search]

Published

2023-05-21

How to Cite

F. PERONAGLIO, F.; MANACERO, A.; J. BALDASSIN, A.; S. DOS SANTOS, M.; S. LOBATO, R.; SPOLON, R.; A. CAVENAGHI, M. Automatic content adaptation in interactive environment for individualized learning. Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education, [S. l.], v. 31, p. 255–270, 2023. DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2023.2906. Disponível em: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/2906. Acesso em: 16 sep. 2024.

Issue

Section

Special Issue :: Remote Teaching in the Post-Pandemic