A design approach for MOOC: a systematic mapping of the articulation between instructional and interaction design

Authors

  • Filipe Adeodato Garrido Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
  • Beatriz Brito Do Rêgo Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0832-0274
  • Rita Suzana P. Maciel Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3159-6065
  • Ecivaldo de Souza Matos Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.115

Keywords:

MOOC, interaction design, instructional design

Abstract

MOOC is an acronym for Massive Open Online Course, an online education modality that offers free courses to diverse audiences with different ages, backgrounds and nationalities. It is believed that design approaches that integrate interaction design and instructional design may favor communicability in MOOC, positively reflecting student learning. In this sense, this article aims to present the results of a Systematic Literature Mapping (SLM). In methodology in this mapping sought to identify studies and primary research related to interaction design and instructional design processes applied to the MOOC. The results found point to the existence of research challenges of theoretical and methodological articulation between interaction design and instructional design in MOOC. The results presented in this article point to the lack of a joint articulation between the areas and support the relevance of a hybrid design approach (articulated interaction design to instructional design) focused on MOOC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Kloos, C. D., e Muñoz-Merino, P. J. (2014). Recommendations for the design and deployment of moocs: insights about the mooc digital education of the future deployed in miríadax. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 403–408.[DOI:10.1145/2669711.2669931].[GS Search]

Baloi, J. A. (2009). A concepção da educação democrática na obra "Democracia e Educação" de Jonh Dewey. Monografia - Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da Universidade São Tomás de Moçambique, Maputo, [s. n.].[GS Search]

Baturay, M. H. (2015). An overview of the world of moocs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 174, pp. 427–433.[DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.685].[GS Search]

Boall, H., Chaves, M., e Stallivieri, L. (2015). Os moocs e o processo de internacionalização das instituições de ensino superior. XV Colóquio Internacional de Gestão Universitária –CIGU INPEAU/Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, [s. n.].[GS Search]

Dal Forno, J. P., e Knoll, G. F. (2013). Os moocs no mundo: um levantamento de cursos online abertos massivos. Nuances: estudos sobre Educação, v. 24, n .3, pp. 178–194.[GS Search]

Delavar, A. (2017). The effect of moocs instructional design model-based on student’s learning and motivation. Man In India, v. 97, n. 11, pp. 115–126.[GS Search]

Do Rêgo, B. B., Garrido, F., e Matos, E. (2017). Identifying influences of the quality of interaction on dropout rates of mooc: preliminary results. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE. Recife -PE. Anais Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação - CBIE, Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, v. 28, n. 1, pp. 1766-1768.[DOI:10.5753/cbie.sbie.2017.1766].[GS Search]

Do Rêgo, B. B., Garrido, F. A., e de Souza Matos, E. (2018). Moodle como ambiente mooc:orientações para o redesign de interação. RENOTE - Revista Novas Tecnologias na Educação , v. 16, n. 1, pp. 1-10.[DOI:10.22456/1679-1916.86050].[GS Search]

Fassbinder, A., Delamaro, M. E., e Barbosa, E. F. (2014). Construção e uso de moocs: uma revisão sistemática. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE. Recife -PE. Anais Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação - CBIE, Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, v. 25, n. 1, pp. 332-341. [DOI:10.5753/cbie.sbie.2014.332].[GS Search]

Filatro, A. (2008). Design instrucional na prática. Pearson Education do Brasil. São Paulo. [GS Search]

Filatro, A., & Piconez, S. C. B. (2004). Design instrucional contextualizado. São Paulo: Senac. [GS Search]

Garrido, F., do Rêgo, B. B., e Matos, E. (2018). Design instrucional orientado a artefatos: uma abordagem participativa e distribuída. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE. Fortaleza -CE. Anais Congresso Brasileiro de Informática na Educação - CBIE, Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, v. 29, n. 129, pp. 258-268. [DOI:10.5753/cbie.sbie.2018.258].[GS Search]

Garrido, F. A. (2018). Uma Abordagem Unificada de Design para Modelagem da Comunicação e Instrução para MOOC. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciência da Computação. Universidade Federal da Bahia - UFBA.

Grainger, B. (2013). Introduction to MOOCs: avalanche, illusion or augmentation. Policy Brief - UNESCO (july). Institute for Information Technologies in Education. [Link].[GS Search]

Howley, I., Tomar, G. S., Ferschke, O., e Rose, C. P. (2017.). Reputation systems impact on help seeking in mooc discussion forums. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, n. 1, pp. 1–14. [DOI:10.1109/TLT.2017.2776273].[GS Search]

Huang, B., e Hew, K. F. (2017). Factors influencing learning and factors influencing persistence: A mixed-method study of mooc learners’ motivation. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information System and Data Mining, , Charleston, SC, USA. ACM. pp. 103-110. [DOI:10.1145/3077584.3077610].[GS Search]

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, v. 33, pp. 1–26. [GS Search]

Kloos, C. D., Ibáñez, M. B., Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Ayres, I. E., Panadero, C. F., e Villena, J. (2016). From software engineering to courseware engineering. In 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1122-1128. [DOI:10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474695].[GS Search]

Loiola, E., e Rocha, M. C. F. (2002). Aprendizagem no Processo de Seleção de Ferramenta CASE para o Estado da Bahia. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 6, n. 2, pp. 145-166. [DOI: 10.1590/S1415-65552002000200009].[GS Search]

Löwgren, J. (2013). Interaction design-brief intro. The Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.". Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam (Eds.). The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Dinamarca, Chapter 1. [Link].[GS Search]

Matta, C. E., e Figueiredo, A. P. S. (2013). Mooc: transformação das práticas de aprendizagem. X Congresso Brasileiro de Ensino Superior a Distância, v. 10, pp. 1-15. [DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1392.8086].[GS Search]

Mattar, J. (2013). Fóruns de discussão em educação à distância: Moodle, facebook e redu. Tecnologia Educacional. Revista Da Associação Brasileira De Tecnologia Educacional, v. 202, pp. 6–17. [GS Search].

Pappano, L (2012). The year of the mooc. The New York Times, v. 2, n. 12, pp. 1–7. [GS Search].

Ramírez-Vega, A., Iniesto, F., e Rodrigo, C. (2017). Raising awareness of the accessibility challenges in mathematics moocs. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, n. 92, pp. 1-8. [DOI: 10.1145/3144826.3145435].[GS Search]

Rocha, R. d. S., e Fantinato, M. (2013). The use of software product lines for business process management: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, v. 55, n. 8, pp. 1355–1373. [DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.007].[GS Search]

Rodés, V., Mustaro, P. N., Silveira, I. F., Omar, N., e Ochôa, X. (2014). Instructional design models to support collaborative open books for open education. In Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, [s. n], ACM. [DOI: 10.1145/2662253.2662346].[GS Search]

Rodrigues, P. A., Brandão, L. d. O., e Brandão, A. A. F. (2016). Let us learn together!: Do complementary abilities foster pair collaboration in web-based learning? Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), IEEE, pp. 1–8. [DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757375].[GS Search]

Rodrigues, R. L., Ramos, J. L. C., Silva, J. C. S., e Gomes, A. S. (2016). Discovery engagement patterns moocs through cluster analysis. IEEE Latin America Transactions, v. 14, n. 9, pp. 4129–4135. [DOI: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7785943].[GS Search]

Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., e Preece, J. (2013). Design de interação: além da interação humano-computador. Bookman. [GS Search]

Sa’don, N. F., Alias, R. A., & Ohshima, N. (2014). Nascent research trends in moocs in higher educational institutions: A systematic literature review. Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL), 2014 International Conference on, pp. 1–4. [DOI: 10.1109/ICWOAL.2014.7009215].[GS Search]

Santos, O. C., Boticario, J. G., e Pérez-Marín, D. (2014). Extending web-based educational systems with personalised support through user centred designed recommendations along the e-learning life cycle. Science of Computer Programming, v. 88, pp .92–109. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scico.2013.12.004].[GS Search]

Zawacki-Richter, O., e Naidu, S. (2016). Mapping research trends from 35 years of publications in distance education. Distance Education, v. 37, n. 3, pp. 245–269. [DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079].[GS Search]

Published

2020-02-16

How to Cite

GARRIDO, F. A.; DO RÊGO, B. B.; MACIEL, R. S. P.; MATOS, E. de S. A design approach for MOOC: a systematic mapping of the articulation between instructional and interaction design. Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education, [S. l.], v. 28, p. 115–132, 2020. DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.115. Disponível em: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/3736. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Awarded Papers

Most read articles by the same author(s)