Development of Technical Reports Writing Ability using Online Peer Assessments and Scoring Rubrics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.166Keywords:
teaching methodology, online peer assesment, scoring rubric, written communication skill, technical reportsAbstract
In this article, we present a teaching methodology structured in a combination of online peer assessment and scoring rubric techniques with the objective of allowing students to follow and evaluate their peers work, attempting to find a more favorable educational environment focused on the development of written communication skills. The methodology was applied in an undergraduate course and the students’ assignment was evaluated by a specialist and the educational quality of the teaching process was measured by means of the multidimensional evaluation instrument of education known as "Students’ Evaluation of Educational Quality" (SEEQ). The results obtained have been promising in two aspects: by influencing the students to produce better technical reports as learning outcomes in contrast to tradicional methodology (teacher’s point of view); have produced a statistically significant and more uniform improvement in the students’ perception of the educational quality used in the course (students’ point of view).
Downloads
References
Andrade, H. (2000, feb). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning.Educational Leadership,57(5), 13-18.[GS Search].
CAMPBELL, Alistair. Application of ICT and rubrics to the assessment process where professional judgement is involved: the features of an e-marking tool. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 30, n. 5, p. 529-537, 2005.[DOI:10.1080/02602930500187055].[GS Search].
COFFEY, Martin; GIBBS, Graham. The evaluation of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, v. 26, n. 1, p. 89-93, 2001.[DOI:10.1080/02602930020022318].[GS Search].
FERREIRA, Danielle Mello; DA SILVA, Angela Carrancho. Avaliação de um Web Fórum por meio de Rubricas. Meta: Avaliação, v. 2, n. 4, p. 87-127, 2010.[GS Search].
FLORIAN-GAVIRIA, Beatriz; GLAHN, Christian; GESA, Ramon Fabregat. A software suite for efficient use of the European qualifications framework in online and blended courses. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, v. 6, n. 3, p. 283-296, 2013.[DOI:10.1109/TLT.2013.18].[GS Search].
FRANÇA, Ana Shirley. Comunicação Escrita Nas Empresas: Teorias E Práticas. Editora Atlas SA, 2000.[GS Search].
GAROUSI, Vahid. Applying peer reviews in software engineering education: An experiment and lessons learned. IEEE Transactions on Education, v. 53, n. 2, p. 182-193, 2009.[DOI:10.1109/TE.2008.2010994].[GS Search].
HUBA, Mary E.; FREED, Jann E. Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Allyn & Bacon, 160 Gould St., Needham Heights, MA 02494, 2000.[GS Search].
LOBATO, Antonio Soares et al. Um sistema gerenciador de rubricas para apoiar a avaliação em ambientes de aprendizagem. XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, Florianópolis/SC, 2009.[GS Search].
MARSH, Herbert W. SEEQ: A RELIABLE, VALID, AND USEFUL INSTRUMENT FOR COLLECTING STUDENTS'EVALUATIONS OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING. British journal of educational psychology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 77-95, 1982.[DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x].[GS Search].
MCGOLDRICK, KimMarie; PETERSON, Brian. Using rubrics in economics. International Review of Economics Education, v. 12, p. 33-47, 2013.[DOI:10.1016/j.iree.2013.04.009].[GS Search].
NG, Eugenia MW. Using a mixed research method to evaluate the effectiveness of formative assessment in supporting student teachers' wiki authoring. Computers & education, v. 73, p. 141-148, 2014.[DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.016].[GS Search].
OLIVEIRA, T. et al. AM (2017). O ensino e aprendizado de Arquitetura e Organização de Computadores num currículo de Engenharia de Computaçao estruturado em uma abordagem prática e sistêmica. International Journal of Computer Architecture Education (IJCAE), v. 6, n. 1, p. 27-36.[GS Search].
OLIVEIRA, Tiago et al. Metodologia de Ensino baseada em Avaliações Colaborativas e Rubricas para o Aprimoramento da Habilidade de Escrita de Relatórios Técnicos em Cursos de Graduação. In: Brazilian Symposium on Computers in Education (Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação-SBIE). 2018. p. 1603.[DOI:10.5753/cbie.sbie.2018.1603].[GS Search].
REDDY, Y. Malini; ANDRADE, Heidi. A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, v. 35, n. 4, p. 435-448, 2010.[DOI:10.1080/02602930902862859].[GS Search].
RICHARDSON, John TE. Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, v. 30, n. 4, p. 387-415, 2005.[DOI:10.1080/02602930500099193].[GS Search].
SILVA, Elaine; MOREIRA, Dilvan. WebCoM: a tool to use peer review to improve student interaction. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), v. 3, n. 1, p. 3, 2003.[DOI:https:10.1145/958795.958798].[GS Search].
TENÓRIO, Thyago et al. Does peer assessment in on-line learning environments work? A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, v. 64, p. 94-107, 2016.[DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.020].[GS Search].
TOPPING, Keith. Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In: Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards. Springer, Dordrecht, 2003. p. 55-87.[DOI:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4].[GS Search].
TRAHASCH, Stephan. From peer assessment towards collaborative learning. In: 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. IEEE, 2004. p. F3F-16.[DOI:10.1109/FIE.2004.1408638].[GS Search].
UGULINO, Wallace et al. Avaliação Colaborativa: um Estudo com a Ferramenta Moodle Workshop. XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, Florianópolis/SC, 2009..[GS Search].
WANG, Yanqing et al. Assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review model: Implementation and experience report. Computers & Education, v. 59, n. 2, p. 412-422, 2012.[DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.007].[GS Search].
ZORZO, A. F. et al. Referenciais de Formação para os Cursos de Graduação em Computação. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (SBC). 153p, 2017. 2017.[GS Search].
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Tiago Oliveira, Denise Stringhin, José Jailson Santos Craibas, Deborah Godoy Martins Corrêa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.