Imprevisibilidade nas Práticas de Planejamento de Aulas: Recomendações para o Design de Sistemas Colaborativos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2025.4982Keywords:
Planejamento de aula, Colaboração entre professores, Educação básica, Sistemas de apoio, Improvisação docente, Design de sistemas educacionaisAbstract
O planejamento de aulas é essencial para a prática docente, mas a falta de tempo, recursos e colaboração entre professores gera desafios. Esse cenário resulta em improvisações constantes e isolamento profissional, prejudicando a eficácia do ensino. O estudo investiga como os sistemas de planejamento colaborativo podem ser aprimorados para promover maior interação e suporte entre professores, permitindo práticas mais flexíveis e adaptáveis. A pesquisa utilizou uma abordagem etnográfica, com entrevistas semi-estruturadas e observações em escolas públicas. O objetivo foi entender as práticas de planejamento e como os docentes enfrentam desafios cotidianos. A colaboração entre professores é limitada pela falta de tempo e infraestrutura, com muitos utilizando ferramentas informais, como o WhatsApp, para compartilhar recursos e planejar. Sistemas de planejamento colaborativo devem ser projetados para facilitar flexibilidade, troca de recursos e colaboração entre professores, superando o isolamento e promovendo práticas mais eficazes e inovadoras no planejamento de aulas.
Downloads
Referências
Alarcão, I. (Ed.). (2005). Formação reflexiva de professores: estratégias de supervisão. Porto Editora. [GS Search]
Almeida, A. R. S. (2022). A emoção na sala de aula. Papirus Editora. [GS Search]
Anderson, R. J. (1994). Representations and requirements: The value of ethnography in system design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI0902_1. [GS Search]
Badawi, M. F. A. (2017). Using collaborative lesson-preparation for developing EFL prospective teachers’ lesson plan quality and pedagogical performance. Journal of Arabic Studies in Education & Psychology (ASEP), 87(2), 451–480. https://doi.org/10.21608/saep.2017.56401. [GS Search]
Bahng, E., & Lee, M. (2017). Learning experiences and practices of elementary teacher candidates on the use of emerging technology: A grounded theory approach. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(2), 225–241. Disponível em: [link]. [GS Search]
Bakkenes, I., De Brabander, C., & Imants, J. (1999). Teacher isolation and communication network analysis in primary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 166–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131619921968518. [GS Search]
Balakrishnan, R., Dahnil, D. P. B., & Ben Mubarak, M. A. A. (2016). Mobile learning, effective integration of new technologies into existing models. In Envisioning the Future of Online Learning (pp. 317–331). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0954-9_28. [GS Search]
Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70. [GS Search]
Blaschke, L. M., & Hase, S. (2016). Heutagogy: A holistic framework for creating twenty-first-century self-determined learners. In The Future of Ubiquitous Learning (pp. 25–40). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47724-3_2. [GS Search]
Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., Llamas-Nistal, M., Blanco-Pesqueira, A., & Álvarez-Lires, F. (2016). A survey about the use of lesson plans as an approach to OER: A proposal based on action research. In 2016 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE.2016.7751864. [GS Search]
Caldwell, H. (2018). Mobile technologies as a catalyst for pedagogic innovation within teacher education. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 10(2), 50–65. Disponível em: [link]. [GS Search]
Charalambous, C. Y., Wright, N., Trask, S., Khoo, E., Page, A., Anderson, J., & Cowie, B. (2021). Patchworks of professional practices: Teacher collaboration in innovative learning environments. Teachers and Teaching, 27(7), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1983536. [GS Search]
Clark, C. M., & Yinger, R. J. (1977). Research on teacher thinking. Curriculum Inquiry, 7(4), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1977.11076224. [GS Search]
Carvalho, A. L. M., & Maia, D. L. (2021). Análise de Aplicações de Dispositivos Android para Desenvolvimento de Planos de Aulas. In Congresso sobre Tecnologias na Educação (Ctrl+ e) (pp. 186-195). SBC. [GS Search]
Coppola, A. J., Scricca, D. B., & Connors, G. E. (2004). Supportive supervision: Becoming a teacher of teachers. Corwin Press. [GS Search]
Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229. [GS Search]
Diehl, L., & Marin, A. H. (2016). Adoecimento mental em professores brasileiros: Revisão sistemática da literatura. Estudos Interdisciplinares em Psicologia, 7(2), 64–85. [GS Search]
Do Carmo Machado, J., & Neves, R. (2015). As contribuições da memória na formação continuada de professores. Revista Eletrônica Debates em Educação Científica e Tecnológica, 5(03), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.5433/2236-6407.2016v7n2p64. [GS Search]
Duffy, G., & Gallagher, T. (2017). Shared education in contested spaces: How collaborative networks improve communities and schools. Journal of Educational Change, 18(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9279-3. [GS Search]
Ellis, V., Souto-Manning, M., & Turvey, K. (2019). Innovation in teacher education: Towards a critical re-examination. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1550602. [GS Search]
Even, S. (2020). Presence and unpredictability in teacher education. Scenario: A Journal for Performative Teaching, Learning, Research, 14(1), 1–10. Disponível em: [link]. [GS Search]
Fagan, C., Lyonette, C., Smith, M., & Saldaña-Tejeda, A. (2012). The influence of working time arrangements on work-life integration or ‘balance’: A review of the international evidence. International Labour Organization. Disponível em: [link]. [GS Search]
Faucon, L., Olsen, J., Haklev, S., & Dillenbourg, P. (2020). Real-time prediction of students' activity progress and completion rates. Journal of Learning Analytics, 7(2), 18–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.72.2 [GS Search]
Flinders, D. J. (1988). Teacher isolation and the new reform. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(1), 17–29. [GS Search]
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (2000). A escola como organização aprendente: Buscando uma educação de qualidade. Artmed. [GS Search]
Gak, D. M. (2011). Textbook: An important element in the teaching process. Hatchaba Journal, 19(2), 78–82. [GS Search]
García-Martínez, I., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Molina-Fernández, E., & Fernández-Batanero, J. (2021). Mapping teacher collaboration for school success. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(4), 631–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1925700. [GS Search]
Gutierez, S. (2021). Collaborative lesson planning as a positive ‘dissonance’ to the teachers’ individual planning practices: Characterizing the features through reflections-on-action. Teacher Development, 25(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1856177. [GS Search]
Hakami, E., & Hernandez-Leo, D. (2021). Teachers’ views about the impact of learning design community platforms on well-being. In 2021 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIE53363.2021.9583651. [GS Search]
Haleta, Y., & Balanutsa, O. (2021). Theory and practice of organization of independent cognitive activity of future teachers by means of information and communication technology in quarantine conditions in Ukraine. In International Conference on Economics, Law and Education Research (ELER 2021). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210320.038. [GS Search]
Hjorth, L., Horst, H., Galloway, A., & Bell, G. (2017). The Routledge companion to digital ethnography. Routledge. [GS Search]
Husserl, E. (1990). The train of thoughts in the lectures. In The Idea of Phenomenology (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2371-9_1. [GS Search]
Ingold, T., & Hallam, E. (2021). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In Creativity and Cultural Improvisation (pp. 1–24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003135531-1. [GS Search]
Iqbal, R., James, A., & Gatward, R. (2005). Designing with ethnography: An integrative approach to CSCW design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 19(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2005.05.003. [GS Search]
Jalongo, M. R., Rieg, S. A., & Helterbran, V. R. (2007). Planning for learning: Collaborative approaches to lesson design and review. Teachers College Press. [GS Search]
Knight, B. A. (2015). Teachers’ use of textbooks in the digital age. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1015812. [GS Search]
Koberstein-Schwarz, M., & Meisert, A. (2022). Pedagogical content knowledge in material-based lesson planning of preservice biology teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 116, 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103745. [GS Search]
KONNO, F., HIGUCHI, Y., & MITSUISHI, T. (2009). A study on a teacher reflection method by presenting differences between lesson plan and actual instructions. Educational technology research, 32(1-2), 101-111. https://doi.org/10.15077/etr.KJ00005817541. [GS Search]
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge University Press. [GS Search]
Levin, B., & Rock, T. (2003). The effects of collaborative action research on preservice and experienced teacher partners in professional development schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487102250287. [GS Search]
Liu, S., Lu, J., & Yin, H. (2022). Can professional learning communities promote teacher innovation? A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103571. [GS Search]
Marconi, M., & Lakatos, E. (2017). Metodologia científica (7ª ed.). Atlas. [GS Search]
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. [GS Search]
Milkova, S. (2012). Strategies for effective lesson planning. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–29. [GS Search]
Moreira, H. (1997). Investigação da motivação do professor: A dimensão esquecida. Revista Educação & Tecnologia, 1, 88–96. [GS Search]
Munoz, G., & Bourmaud, G. (2012). Éléments de système d’instruments pour enseignants: une analyse auprès de conseillers pédagogiques. In Actes du colloque OUFOREP (pp. 427–436). Université de Nantes. [GS Search]
Murphy, E. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00401.x. [GS Search]
Nacak, A., Bağlama, B., & Demir, B. (2020). Teacher candidate views on the use of YouTube for educational purposes. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(2), e202003. https://doi.org/10.29333/ojcmt/7827. [GS Search]
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2014). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. MIT Press. [GS Search]
Nias, J. (1998). Why teachers need their colleagues: A developmental perspective. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 1257-1271). Springer. [GS Search]
Nunes, L. de O. (2015). “A tensão da coletividade”: Uma etnografia sobre a construção do planejamento coletivo na educação física do I Ciclo da Rede Municipal de Ensino de Porto Alegre/RS (Master's dissertation). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS. [GS Search]
Oliveira, P. P. M. (2016). O YouTube como ferramenta pedagógica. In SIED: EnPED-Simpósio Internacional de Educação a Distância e Encontro de Pesquisadores em Educação a Distância. [GS Search]
O'Malley, C. (Ed.). (2012). Computer supported collaborative learning. Springer Science & Business Media. [GS Search]
Perlman, D., & Peplau, L. A. (1982). Theoretical approaches to loneliness. Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy, 36, 123-34. [GS Search]
Petko, D., Egger, N., Waldis, M., Cantieni, A., & Reusser, K. (2019). Metapholio: A mobile app for supporting collaborative note taking and reflection in teacher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(4), 699-710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09398-6. [GS Search]
Pimentel, M., & Fuks, H. (Eds.). (2011). Sistemas colaborativos. Elsevier. [GS Search]
Pink, S. (2021). Digital futures anthropology. In H. A. Horst & D. Miller (Eds.), Digital anthropology (pp. 307-324). Routledge. [GS Search]
Pink, S., Akama, Y., & Sumartojo, S. (2018). Uncertainty and possibility: New approaches to future making in design anthropology. Bloomsbury Publishing. [GS Search]
Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733962c. [GS Search]
Pink, S., & Mackley, K. L. (2015). Social science, design and everyday life: Refiguring showering through anthropological ethnography. Journal of Design Research, 13(3), 278-292. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2015.071454. [GS Search]
Pink, S., Sumartojo, S., Lupton, D., & Heyes La Bond, C. (2017). Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society, 4(1), 2053951717700924. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717700924. [GS Search]
Robinson, H., Segal, J., & Sharp, H. (2007). Ethnographically-informed empirical studies of software practice. Information and Software Technology, 49(6), 540-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.007. [GS Search]
Rodrigues, L., Guerino, G., da Veloso, T. E., Bianchini, L. P., Xavier, M. X., Vieira, T., ... & Isotani, S. (2024, November). MathAIde in the Classroom: A Qualitative Analysis of Teachers' Perspectives of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Unplugged. In Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE) (pp. 1515-1528). SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbie.2024.242017. [GS Search]
Saad, A. (2011). A case-based system for lesson plan construction (Doctoral dissertation). Loughborough University. [GS Search]
Sampaio, M. M. F., & Marin, A. J. (2004). Precarização do trabalho docente e seus efeitos sobre as práticas curriculares. Educação & Sociedade, 25, 1203-1225. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302004000400007. [GS Search]
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3. [GS Search]
Schmitt, J. C., Vieira, P. R., & de Andrade Martins, E. B. (2018). O exercício da docência entre incentivos e regulações: o processo de adoecimento do professorado da educação básica. Educação em Perspectiva, 9(2), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.22294/eduper/ppge/ufv.v9i2.959. [GS Search]
Silva, C. J. P. (2020). Design de um sistema de informação para apoiar a atividade de planejamento de aulas: Uma abordagem situada (Master's dissertation). Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE. [GS Search]
Skinner, E., & Beers, J. (2016). Mindfulness and teachers’ coping in the classroom: A developmental model of teacher stress, coping, and everyday resilience. In K. A. Schonert-Reichl & R. W. Roeser (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness in education (pp. 99-118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3506-2_7. [GS Search]
Sonia, G. et al. (Eds.). (2017). Educational research and innovation pedagogical knowledge and the changing nature of the teaching profession. OECD Publishing. [GS Search]
Stanovich, P. J. (1996). Collaboration: The key to successful instruction in today's inclusive schools. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(1), 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129603200108. [GS Search]
Tichenor, M., & Tichenor, J. (2019). Collaboration in the elementary school: What do teachers think? Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 8(2), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v8n2p54. [GS Search]
Trevisan, K. R. R. (2020). Avaliação da associação entre carga mental de trabalho, fatores de risco psicossociais ocupacionais e agravos à saúde mental de professores (Master's dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC. [GS Search]
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In D. J. Flinders & S. J. Thornton (Eds.), Curriculum Studies Reader E2 (pp. 60-68). Routledge. [GS Search]
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002. [GS Search]
Wiercinski, A. (2020). Hermeneutics of education: Exploring and experiencing the unpredictability of education. LIT Verlag Münster. [GS Search]
Xiaofeng, W., Qi, W., & Ling, C. (2015). A case study of online-based collaborative lesson planning. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace (ICELW 2015). Kaleidoscope Learning. [GS Search]
Yeh, Y.-F., Chan, K. K. H., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2021). Toward a framework that connects individual TPACK and collective TPACK: A systematic review of TPACK studies investigating teacher collaborative discourse in the learning by design process. Computers & Education, 171, 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238. [GS Search]
Arquivos adicionais
Published
Como Citar
Issue
Section
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Leandro Marques Queiros, Alex Sandro Gomes, Carlos José Pereira da Silva, Aluísio José Pereira, Rosane Silva, Francisco Kelsen de Oliveira
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
