Self-Regulated Learning Traits in Students' Behavior Interactions in a Ubiquitous Learning Environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2026.6368

Keywords:

Ubiquitous Learning Environment, Educational Data Mining, Clustering, Self-Regulated Learning

Abstract

Computers have become an integral part of everyday life. In education, these technologies enable the creation of Ubiquitous Learning Environments, which enrich the learning experience by providing more dynamic and engaging contexts, both in-person and online. Educators and institutions increasingly adopt technological tools to strengthen teaching and learning processes. As a result, the extensive use of these technologies has produced valuable data repositories that can be explored through data mining methods. In this context, this study presents an exploratory analysis of interaction data collected from a Ubiquitous Learning Environment, using Educational Data Mining techniques. Clustering methods were applied to explore students’ behavior in learning sessions and to identify patterns associated with their quiz performance in the environment. Three data mining algorithms were applied to five distinct datasets, each prepared with different preprocessing strategies. The results showed that clustering performance is highly sensitive to data preprocessing, with the best outcomes achieved using feature selection and aggregation techniques. The findings showed statistically significant distinctions among the clusters and uncovered evidence of self-regulated learning within one of the groups. However, the effect size analysis indicated that only a subset of attributes, particularly those related to study time and interaction, presented substantial practical differences between clusters. These results suggest that students exhibiting higher levels of interaction and engagement tend to achieve better performance, indicating behavioral patterns potentially associated with self-regulated learning.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abowd, G. D., Atkeson, C. G., Feinstein, A., Hmelo, C., Kooper, R., Long, S., Sawhney, N., & Tani, M. (1997). Teaching and learning as multimedia authoring: The classroom 2000 project. Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/244130.244191 [GS Search].

Aldowah, H., Al-Samarraie, H., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019). Educational data mining and learning analytics for 21st century higher education: A review and synthesis. Telematics and Informatics, 37, 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.01.007 [GS Search].

Araújo, R. D., Brant-Ribeiro, T., Ferreira, H., Dorça, F., & Cattelan, R. (2016). Segmentação colaborativa de objetos de aprendizagem utilizando bookmarks em ambientes educacionais ubíquos. Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, 1205–1214. [GS Search].

Baker, R., Xu, D., Park, J., Yu, R., Li, Q., Cung, B., Fischer, C., Rodriguez, F., Warschauer, M., & Smyth, P. (2020). The benefits and caveats of using clickstream data to understand student self-regulatory behaviors: Opening the black box of learning processes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00187-1 [GS Search].

Baker, R. S. J. D., Martin, T., & Rossi, L. M. (2016). Educational data mining and learning analytics (A. A. Rupp & J. P. Leighton, Eds.), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 [GS Search].

Bittencourt, I. I., & Isotani, S. (2018). Informática na educação baseada em evidências: Um manifesto. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, 26(03), 108. [GS Search].

Bogarín Vega, A., Romero Morales, C., & Cerezo Menéndez, R. (2016). Aplicando minería de datos para descubrir rutas de aprendizaje frecuentes en Moodle. Edmetic. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v5i1.4017 [GS Search].

Brusilovsky, P., & Millán, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In The adaptive web: Methods and strategies of web personalization (pp. 3–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1 [GS Search].

Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., & Sander, J. (2013). Density-based clustering based on hierarchical density estimates. In J. Pei, V. S. Tseng, L. Cao, H. Motoda, & G. Xu (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 160–172). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_14 [GS Search].

Carmo, Ê. P., Gasparini, I., & Oliveira, E. (2019). Captura e visualização das trajetórias de aprendizagem como ferramentas para a análise do comportamento dos estudantes em um ambiente adaptativo educacional. Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2019.309 [GS Search].

Cattelan, R. G., Araújo, R. D., Ferreira, H. N., Brant-Ribeiro, T., & Dorça, F. A. (2025). Classroom experience: From automated multimedia capture to personalized learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 84(24), 27609–27645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-024-20238-3 [GS Search].

Cerezo, R., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Paule-Ruiz, M. P., & Núñez, J. C. (2016). Students' LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: A case study in higher education. Computers & Education, 96, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.006 [GS Search].

Costa, J. A., Dorça, F. A., & Araújo, R. D. (2020). Avaliação do comportamento de estudantes em um ambiente educacional ubíquo. Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2020.182 [GS Search].

Damayanti, A., Kusumawardani, S. S., & Wibirama, S. (2023). A review of learners' self-regulated learning behavior analysis using log-data traces. 2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED59801.2023.10264050 [GS Search].

Devasia, T., Vinushree, T., & Hegde, V. (2016). Prediction of students performance using educational data mining. 2016 International Conference on Data Mining and Advanced Computing (SAPIENCE), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAPIENCE.2016.7684167 [GS Search].

Dol, S. M., & Jawandhiya, P. M. (2023). Classification technique and its combination with clustering and association rule mining in educational data mining—a survey. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 122, 106071. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2018.1516628 [GS Search].

El-Halees, A. M. (2009). Mining students data to analyze e-learning behavior: A case study. Mining students data to analyze e-Learning behavior: A Case Study, 29. https://doi.org/10.1109/icca-ticet.2018.8726203 [GS Search].

Farida, A., & Sudibyo, N. A. (2022). Implementation of the k-means algorithm on learning outcomes and self-regulated learning. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 147–154. [Link] [GS Search].

García, E., Romero, C., Ventura, S., & Castro, C. (2011). A collaborative educational association rule mining tool. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.006 [GS Search].

Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100–108. Retrieved June 22, 2024, from [Link] [GS Search].

IBM Corp. Released 2011. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815764-0.00027-7 [GS Search].

IEEE. (2002, July). Draft standard for learning object metadata. [Link] [GS Search].

Kinshuk, Chen, N.-S., Cheng, I.-L., & Chew, S. W. (2016). Evolution is not enough: Revolutionizing current learning environments to smart learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 561–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0108-x [GS Search].

Kitsantas, A. (2013). Fostering college students' self-regulated learning with learning technologies. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 235–252. [Link] [GS Search].

Lallé, S., & Conati, C. (2020). A data-driven student model to provide adaptive support during video watching across MOOCs. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_23 [GS Search].

Melissa Ng Lee Yen, A. (2020). The influence of self-regulation processes on metacognition in a virtual learning environment. Educational Studies, 46(1), 1–17. [GS Search].

Monteverde, I., Amaral, G., Ramos, D., Nascimento, P., Gadelha, B., & Oliveira, E. (2017). Mcluster: Uma ferramenta de recomendaçao para formaçao de grupos em ambientes virtuais de aprendizagem. Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, 1657–1666. https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2017.1657 [GS Search].

Moore, M. G. (2013). The theory of transactional distance. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 66–85). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738 [GS Search].

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 [GS Search].

Peraic, I., & Grubišić, A. (2023). Exploring student engagement in online programming courses: A two-level k-means analysis. 2023 International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23919/SoftCOM58365.2023.10271619 [GS Search].

Pimentel, M. G., Ishiguro, Y., Kerimbaev, B., Abowd, G. D., & Guzdial, M. (2001). Supporting educational activities through dynamic web interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 13(3), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(00)00042-4 [GS Search].

Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50043-3 [GS Search].

Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research - SCAND J EDUC RES, 45, 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830120074206 [GS Search].

Ramos, J., Santos, L., Silva, J., & Rodrigues, R. (2020). Identificação de perfis de interação de estudantes de educação a distância por meio de técnicas de agrupamentos. Anais do XXXI Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, 932–941. https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2020.932 [GS Search].

Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power Comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling Tests. Journal of statistical modeling and analytics, 2(1), 21–33. [GS Search].

Rodriguez, F., Lee, H. R., Rutherford, T., Fischer, C., Potma, E., & Warschauer, M. (2021). Using clickstream data mining techniques to understand and support first-generation college students in an online chemistry course. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448169 [GS Search].

Saa, A. A. (2016). Educational data mining & students' performance prediction. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(5), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.22610/jevr.v3i5.60 [GS Search].

Self, J. (1990). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: At the crossroads of ai and education (pp. 107–123). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb14035.x [GS Search].

Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., & Kumar, V. (2016). Introduction to data mining. Pearson Education India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-7307-6_1 [GS Search].

Urdan, T. (2010). Statistics in Plain English (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2011.00149_21.x [GS Search].

Viberg, O., Khalil, M., & Baars, M. (2020). Self-regulated learning and learning analytics in online learning environments: A review of empirical research. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge, 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375483 [GS Search].

Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1145/2555243.2558890 [GS Search].

Zhao, X., & Okamoto, T. (2011). Adaptive multimedia content delivery for context-aware u-learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmlo.2011.038691 [GS Search].

Zimmerman, B., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614 [GS Search].

Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(4), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5 [GS Search].

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American educational research journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909 [GS Search].

Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 311–328). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876428 [GS Search].

Arquivos adicionais

Published

2026-05-28

Como Citar

COSTA, J. A. R.; LIMA, G. D. O.; ARAÚJO, R. D.; DORÇA, F. A. Self-Regulated Learning Traits in Students’ Behavior Interactions in a Ubiquitous Learning Environment. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, [S. l.], v. 34, p. 770–798, 2026. DOI: 10.5753/rbie.2026.6368. Disponível em: https://journals-sol.sbc.org.br/index.php/rbie/article/view/6368. Acesso em: 30 maio. 2026.

Issue

Section

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)