Comparing the Perceptions of Middle and High School Students from Different Socioeconomic Status Backgrounds on Learning Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2025.5751Keywords:
Machine Learning, Education, Socioeconomic Status, Perception, Middle School, High SchoolAbstract
Machine Learning (ML) is increasingly integral to modern life, requiring its introduction to young individuals across all socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Various initiatives are emerging for the integration of ML into the education of young students including the development of curricula, courses and activities. And although first applications indicate positive findings with regard to the students’ learning, there still is a lack of research on the effect of such teaching efforts across students from different SES backgrounds. Therefore, this study investigates the impact of different SES backgrounds on the students' understanding and application of ML basic concepts through the application of the ML4ALL! course to 266 middle and high school students from different SES backgrounds. The findings reveal significant differences in students' understanding and explanation of ML concepts, indicating that this may be affected by their SES background. However, students' perceived ability to apply ML concepts and the perceived difficulty in learning ML were consistent across all groups. The results indicate that although the SES background may influence students' learning, it does not necessarily limit their perceived ability to engage with AI/ML concepts. The insights from this study may contribute to a better understanding of the perceptions of students from a low SES background regarding AI/ML learning and can assist in facilitating the development of inclusive, effective, and enjoyable educational approaches.
Downloads
Referências
AI+. (2021). Developing an artificial intelligence curriculum adapted to European high schools. Retrieved from [Link].
AI4ALL. (2023). Retrieved from [Link].
Agência Brasil. (2023). PISA: Less than half of Brazilian students know basic math, science. Retrieved from [Link].
Amershi, S., Begel, A., Bird, C., DeLine, R., Gall, H., & Kamar, E. (2019). Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study. Proc. of the IEEE/ACM Int. Conf. on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice, Montreal, Canada, 291--300. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIP.2019.00042. [GS Search]
APA. (2023). American Psychological Association. Retrieved from [Link].
Avvisati, F. (2020). The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: a review and some suggested improvements. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 8(8),2-37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00086-x. [GS Search]
Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., & Rombach, H. D. (1994). Goal Question Metric Paradigm. In Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, pp. 646-661. Wiley. [GS Search]
Breda, T., Grenet, J., Monnet, M., & Van Effenterre, C. (2020). Do Female Role Models Reduce the Gender Gap in Science? Evidence from French High Schools (IZA DP No. 13163). IZA Institute of Labor Economics. [GS Search]
Camada, M. Y., & Durães, G. M. (2020). Ensino da Inteligência Artificial na Educação Básica: um novo horizonte para as pesquisas brasileiras. In: Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE), 31. Porto Alegre: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, p. 1553-1562. https://doi.org/10.5753/cbie.sbie.2020.1553. [GS Search]
Casal-Otero, L., Catala, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. Int. Journal of STEM Education, 10(29), 2-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7. [GS Search]
Chen, Q., Kong, Y., Gao, W., & Mo, L. (2018). Effects of Socioeconomic Status, Parent--Child Relationship, and Learning Motivation on Reading Ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1664-1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297. [GS Search]
Destin, M., Hanselman, P., Buontempo, J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Do Student Mindsets Differ by Socioeconomic Status and Explain Disparities in Academic Achievement in the United States? AERA Open, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419857706. [GS Search]
Domenico, D. M., & Jones, K. H. (2006). Career aspirations of women in the 20th century. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 22(2), Fall 2006. ERIC Number: EJ901302. 1531-4952. Retrieved from [Link]. [GS Search]
Elements of AI. (2023). Elements of AI. University of Helsinki. Retrieved from [Link].
Everson, J., Kivuva, F. M., & Ko, A. J. (2022). A Key to Reducing Inequities in Life, AI, is by Reducing Inequities Everywhere First: Emerging Critical Consciousness in a Co-Constructed Secondary CS Classroom. In Proc. of the ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Providence, RI, USA, 209-215. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.3499395. [GS Search]
Finau, J. (2021). How socioeconomic status affects students. Capstone project, Liberal Studies Program, California State University, Chico. ScholarWorks. Retrieved from [Link]. [GS Search]
Freitas, E. L. S. X., Bittencourt, I. I.; Isotani, S., Marques, L., Dermeval, D.; Silva, A., & Mello, R. F. (2025). Inteligência Artificial para Educação: Um Caminho para um Campo mais Inclusivo. Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, [S. l.], v. 31, p. 307--322. http://doi.org/10.5753/rbie.2023.3156. [GS Search]
GlobalStemYouth. (2021). The "Masculine" culture of STEM fields. Retrieved from [Link].
Google. (2023). Google Teachable Machine. Retrieved from [Link].
Google A. I. Experiment. (2022). Quick Draw!. Retrieved from [Link].
Governo Federal (2024). Destaques IDEB e SAEB 2023. Retrieved from [Link].
Gretter, S., Yadav, A., Sands, P., & Hambrusch, S. (2019). Equitable Learning Environments in K-12 Computing: Teachers' Views on Barriers to Diversity. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 19(3), Article 24. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3282939. [GS Search]
Hash bits. (2018). Object Detector. Retrieved from [Link].
IBGE. (2024a). One out of every four women aged 15 to 29 were not working or studying in 2023. Continuous PNAD. Retrieved from [Link].
IBGE. (2024b). Child education grows in 2023 and returns to pre-pandemic level. Summary of Social Indicators (SIS). Retrieved from [Link].
IBM. (2023). IBM SkillsBuild. Retrieved from [Link].
IVG. (2022). Pode Crer Program: 2022 Social Impact Report. Retrieved from [Link].
Langenkamp, A. G., & Carbonaro, W. (2018). How school socioeconomic status affects achievement growth across school transitions in early educational careers. Sociology of Education, 91(4), 358--378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040718802257. [GS Search]
Lee, I., Ali, S., Zhang, H., DiPaola, D., & Breazeal, C. (2021). Developing Middle School Students' AI Literacy. In Proc. of the ACM Technical Symposium On Computer Science Education,Virtual Event, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432513. [GS Search]
Lee, I., Martin, F., Denner, J., Coulter, B., Allan, W., Erickson, J., Malyn-Smith, J., & Werner, L. (2011). Computational thinking for youth in practice. ACM Inroads, 2(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929902. [GS Search]
Li, S., Xu, Q., & Xia, R. (2020). Relationship Between SES and Academic Achievement of Junior High School Students in China: The Mediating Effect of Self-Concept. Frontiers in Psychology, 10,1664-1078. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02513. [GS Search]
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 1--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727. [GS Search]
Martins, R. M., & von Wangenheim, C. G. (2023). Teaching Computing to Middle and High School Students from a Low Socio-Economic Status Background: A Systematic Literature Review. Informatics in Education, 23(1), 179-222. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.01. [GS Search]
Martins, R. M., von Wangenheim, C. G., Rauber, M. F., & Hauck, J. C. (2023a). Machine Learning for All!---Introducing Machine Learning in Middle and High School. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24, 185-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00325-y. [GS Search]
Martins, R. M., von Wangenheim, C. G., Rauber, M. F., Hauck, J. C., & Silvestre, F. M. (2023b). Teaching Machine Learning to Middle and High School Students from a Low Socio-Economic Status Background. Informatics in Education, 23(3), 647-678. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.13. [GS Search]
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls' interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424--437. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000061. [GS Search]
Mau, W.-C. J., & Li, J. (2018). Factors influencing STEM career aspirations of underrepresented high school students. The Career Development Quarterly, 66, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12146. [GS Search]
MEC. (2017). Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Retrieved from [Link].
MIT OpenCourseWare. (2023). Retrieved from [Link].
MIT. (2023). The gender gap in STEM: Still gaping in 2023. Retrieved from [Link].
MIT. (2017). MIT Moral Machine. Retrieved from [Link].
Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine learning. McGraw-Hill.
OECD PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Brazil [Factsheet]. Retrieved from [Link].
OECD PISA. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where All Students Can Succeed. OECD Publishing, Paris. [Link]. [GS Search]
Parker, M. C., & Guzdial, M. (2015). A critical research synthesis of privilege in computing education. In Proc. of Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology, Charlotte, NC, USA, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT.2015.7296502. [GS Search]
Perry, L.B., Saatcioglu, A., & Mickelson, R.A. (2022). Does school SES matter less for high-performing students than for their lower-performing peers? A quantile regression analysis of PISA 2018 Australia. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 10(17), 2-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00137-5. [GS Search]
Rauber, M. F., von Wangenheim, C. G., Barbetta, P. A., Borgatto, A. F., Martins, R. M., & Hauck, J. C. R. (2023). Reliability and Validity of an Automated Model for Assessing the Learning of Machine Learning in Middle and High School. Informatics in Education. Online. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.10. [GS Search]
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson Education Limited.
Sharifani, K., & Amini, M. (2023). Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Review of Methods and Applications. World Information Technology and Engineering Journal, 10(07), 3897-3904. [GS Search]
TeachAI. (2023). Retrieved from [Link].
TIC Educação (2022). Pesquisa sobre o uso das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação nas escolas brasileiras. Cetic.br. Retrieved from [Link].
Touretzky, D. S., Gardner-McCune, C., & Seehorn, D. (2022). Machine learning and the five big ideas in AI. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Springer, Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00314-1. [GS Search]
Touretzky, D. S., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K-12: What Should Every Child Know about AI? In Proceedings of the 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Honolulu, HI, USA, 9725-9726. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795. [GS Search]
United Nations. (2015). The 17 Goals. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development. Retrieved from [Link].
UNESCO (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report Team - Global education monitoring report summary, 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Document code: ED/GEMR/MRT/2023/S1/Rev. Retrieved from [Link].
UNESCO. (2022). K-12 AI curricula -- A mapping of government-endorsed AI curricula. Paris.
UNESCO. (2017). Reducing Global Poverty Through Universal Primary and Secondary Education. Policy Paper 32. Paris. [Link].
UNICEF. (2023). Girls' education. [Link].
UNICEF. (2021). The State of the Global Education Crisis: a Path to Recovery. A joint UNESCO, UNICEF and World Bank report. Geneva.
UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. (2014). Quasi-Experimental Design and Methods. Retrieved from [Link].
Vekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students' ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences. Computers & Education, 54(4), 941-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.029. [GS Search]
Visio.ai. (2024). Image recognition: The basics and use cases (2024 guide). Retrieved from [Link].
von Wangenheim, C. G., Hauck, J. C. R., Pacheco, F. S., & Bueno, M. F. B. (2021). Visual Tools for Teaching Machine Learning in K-12: A Ten-Year Systematic Mapping. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5733-5778. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10570-8. [GS Search]
von Wangenheim, C. G., & von Wangenheim, A. (2021). Overview on a human-centric interactive ML process for teaching ML in K-12. Working Paper WP_GQS_01_2021_v10, GQS/INCoD/UFSC. Retrieved from [Link]. [GS Search]
von Wangenheim, C. G., Petri, G., Zibetti, A. W., Borgatto, A. F., Hauck, J. C. R., Pacheco, F. S., & Missfeldt Filho, R. (2017). dETECT: A model for the evaluation of instructional units for teaching computing in middle school. Informatics in Education, 16(2), 301-318. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2017.15. [GS Search]
World Bank. (2023). Girls' education. Retrieved from [Link].
Yu, Y. (2023). Deep learning approaches for image classification. In Proc. of the International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering, Xiamen, China, 1494-1498. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573428.3573691 [GS Search]
Zhang, H., Lee, I., Ali, S., Sargent, J., & Hsu, W. (2022). Integrating Ethics and Career Futures with Technical Learning to Promote AI Literacy for Middle School Students: An Exploratory Study. Int. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. Online. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00293-3 [GS Search]
Zhou, Y., Zhan, Z., Liu, L., Wan, J., Liu, S., & Zou, X. (2023). International Prospects and Trends of Artificial Intelligence Education: A Content Analysis of Top-level AI Curriculum across Countries. In Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education, New York, NY, USA, 337--343. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568739.3568796 [GS Search]
Arquivos adicionais
Published
Como Citar
Issue
Section
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramon Mayor Martins, Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim, Marcelo Fernando Rauber, Jean Carlo Rossa Hauck, Adriano Ferreti Borgato
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
